Liquid Ejecting Head Driving Waveform Determination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing liquid ejecting apparatuses face challenges in determining driving waveforms for optimal ink ejection, as manual user intervention is burdensome and automated methods either lack accuracy or incur unnecessary ink consumption and prolonged recovery times due to abnormal ejection conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method that combines simulation and actual measurement to determine the driving waveform, where ejection characteristics are first simulated and then verified through actual measurement, optimizing the waveform based on the results to achieve desired ejection characteristics while minimizing unnecessary measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If automated actual measurement is performed to determine driving waveform, then user burden is reduced, but ink consumption increases and recovery time increases due to ejection abnormalities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser burdenVSAvoidink consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing simulation measurements before actual measurements to predict ejection characteristics and identify waveform candidates that are likely to succeed. This preliminary simulation step filters out poor waveform candidates, so when actual measurements are performed, the liquid ejecting head is less likely to encounter ejection abnormalities that would waste ink and require recovery time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If automated simulation is performed to determine driving waveform, then user burden is reduced, but determination accuracy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser burdenVSAvoiddetermination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges simulation measurement and actual measurement into a hybrid automated determination system. The simulation provides initial predictions and filters candidates, while actual measurements verify and refine the results. This combination maintains low user burden while achieving high determination accuracy by leveraging the strengths of both automated simulation and automated actual measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If multiple waveform parameters are changed manually to measure ejection characteristics, then determination accuracy is improved, but user burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination accuracyVSAvoiduser burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by implementing an automated determination system where the system itself performs waveform parameter changes, simulation measurements, and actual measurements without requiring manual user intervention. The processing circuit automatically iterates through multiple waveform candidates, evaluates their ejection characteristics, and determines the optimal driving waveform, thereby maintaining high determination accuracy while eliminating user burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If actual measurement is performed under ejection abnormality conditions, then waveform determination is completed, but recovery time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination speedVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by using simulation measurements to predict and prevent ejection abnormalities before they occur during actual measurements. The simulation identifies waveform candidates that are likely to cause ejection failures, allowing the system to avoid selecting those candidates for actual measurement. This preliminary prevention reduces the frequency of ejection abnormalities and minimizes recovery time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS11964480B2Driving waveform determining method, non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing driving waveform determining program, liquid ejecting apparatus, and driving waveform determining system
Publication Date: 2024.04.23 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US11964480B2 patent drawing
  • US11964480B2 patent drawing
  • US11964480B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driving waveform determining method with which a waveform of a driving pulse applied to a driving element provided in a liquid ejecting head that ejects a liquid is determined includes: a first step of measuring, by performing a simulation, ejection characteristics of the liquid from the liquid ejecting head when a waveform candidate is used for the driving pulse; a second step of measuring, by performing an actual measurement, the ejection characteristics of the liquid from the liquid ejecting head when the waveform candidate is used for the driving pulse; and a third step of determining the waveform of the driving pulse in accordance with a measurement result obtained in the first step and a measurement result obtained in the second step.