Liquid Ejecting Head Driving Waveform Determination
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing liquid ejecting apparatuses face challenges in determining driving waveforms for optimal ink ejection, as manual user intervention is burdensome and automated methods either lack accuracy or incur unnecessary ink consumption and prolonged recovery times due to abnormal ejection conditions.
Innovation Solution
A method that combines simulation and actual measurement to determine the driving waveform, where ejection characteristics are first simulated and then verified through actual measurement, optimizing the waveform based on the results to achieve desired ejection characteristics while minimizing unnecessary measurements.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If automated actual measurement is performed to determine driving waveform, then user burden is reduced, but ink consumption increases and recovery time increases due to ejection abnormalities
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by performing simulation measurements before actual measurements to predict ejection characteristics and identify waveform candidates that are likely to succeed. This preliminary simulation step filters out poor waveform candidates, so when actual measurements are performed, the liquid ejecting head is less likely to encounter ejection abnormalities that would waste ink and require recovery time.
2Ease of operation
If automated simulation is performed to determine driving waveform, then user burden is reduced, but determination accuracy is insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges simulation measurement and actual measurement into a hybrid automated determination system. The simulation provides initial predictions and filters candidates, while actual measurements verify and refine the results. This combination maintains low user burden while achieving high determination accuracy by leveraging the strengths of both automated simulation and automated actual measurement.
3Measurement precision
If multiple waveform parameters are changed manually to measure ejection characteristics, then determination accuracy is improved, but user burden increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies self-service by implementing an automated determination system where the system itself performs waveform parameter changes, simulation measurements, and actual measurements without requiring manual user intervention. The processing circuit automatically iterates through multiple waveform candidates, evaluates their ejection characteristics, and determines the optimal driving waveform, thereby maintaining high determination accuracy while eliminating user burden.
4Productivity
If actual measurement is performed under ejection abnormality conditions, then waveform determination is completed, but recovery time increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary anti-action by using simulation measurements to predict and prevent ejection abnormalities before they occur during actual measurements. The simulation identifies waveform candidates that are likely to cause ejection failures, allowing the system to avoid selecting those candidates for actual measurement. This preliminary prevention reduces the frequency of ejection abnormalities and minimizes recovery time.
Data Source
AI summary
A driving waveform determining method with which a waveform of a driving pulse applied to a driving element provided in a liquid ejecting head that ejects a liquid is determined includes: a first step of measuring, by performing a simulation, ejection characteristics of the liquid from the liquid ejecting head when a waveform candidate is used for the driving pulse; a second step of measuring, by performing an actual measurement, the ejection characteristics of the liquid from the liquid ejecting head when the waveform candidate is used for the driving pulse; and a third step of determining the waveform of the driving pulse in accordance with a measurement result obtained in the first step and a measurement result obtained in the second step.


