Liquid Ejecting Apparatus Passage Resistance Equalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing liquid ejecting apparatuses face challenges in maintaining consistent flow rates and pressures between multiple liquid ejecting heads, leading to instability in ink temperature and ejection performance due to differences in passage resistances and flow rates.

Innovation Solution

The apparatus features a tank system with specific passage configurations, including a third passage connecting to both heads, where the passage length and cross-sectional area are optimized to equalize resistance and flow rates, and a heating unit to maintain stable ink temperature, along with a depressurizing unit to control pressure and prevent backflow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a common passage connects to multiple liquid ejecting heads, then liquid supply is simplified, but differences in passage resistance cause inconsistent flow rates and pressure between heads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassage configurationVSAvoidejection performance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the fourth passage (connecting to first head) have much larger passage resistance than the fifth passage (connecting to second head). This localized differentiation in passage resistance compensates for the different distances from the tank, ensuring that both heads receive liquid at comparable pressures and flow rates despite their different positions in the passage network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If passage lengths from tank to different heads are different, then heads are positioned at different locations, but this creates pressure and flow rate differences between heads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehead positioning flexibilityVSAvoidflow rate consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetry by intentionally creating unequal passage resistances in the fourth and fifth passages. The fourth passage has much larger resistance to compensate for its shorter length from the tank, while the fifth passage has smaller resistance to compensate for its longer length. This asymmetric design balances the pressure and flow rate delivered to each head, ensuring consistent ejection performance despite different head positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Quantity of substance

If liquid flow rate to a head exceeds ejection capacity, then supply is sufficient, but backward flow can occur causing temperature instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid supply quantityVSAvoidliquid temperature stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling the flow rate of liquid supplied to each head through carefully designed passage resistances. By making the fourth passage resistance much larger than the fifth, the system regulates the flow rate to match or slightly exceed ejection capacity without causing excessive backflow, thereby maintaining stable liquid temperature and consistent ejection performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration ensures stable ejection performance by maintaining consistent flow rates and pressures between heads, preventing temperature instability and ensuring efficient ink supply, thereby enhancing printing quality and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

a heating unit heating the liquid to supply heated liquid to the liquid ejecting heads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

A passage resistance of the fourth passage is much larger than a passage resistance from the tank to the first position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9421784B2Liquid ejecting apparatus
Publication Date: 2016.08.23 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US9421784B2 patent drawing
  • US9421784B2 patent drawing
  • US9421784B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid ejecting apparatus includes a first passage through which liquid flows from a tank to liquid ejecting heads; and a second passage through which liquid flows from the heads to the tank. The first passage includes a third passage connecting to the tank, a fourth passage branching from the third passage at a first position to allow the third passage to communicate with a first head, and a fifth passage branching from the third passage at a second position to allow the third passage to communicate with a second head. The lengths, cross-sectional areas, and resistances of various passages are set relative to others.