Liquid Ejection Head Filling Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing liquid ejecting apparatuses face issues with air bubbles being drawn into the flow path during the filling process, particularly when the recovery tank is depressurized, leading to inefficient ink supply and potential ejection failures.

Innovation Solution

A liquid ejecting apparatus with a pressurizing mechanism for the supply tank and a depressurizing mechanism for the recovery tank, where the filling process is controlled to maintain a pressure in the recovery tank greater than the absolute value of the meniscus breaking pressure during a specific filling period, preventing the meniscus from breaking and thus avoiding air bubble introduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the recovery tank is depressurized during the filling process to reduce the amount of liquid discharged from the nozzle, then the liquid filling efficiency is improved, but air bubbles are drawn into the flow path in the liquid ejection head

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid filling efficiencyVSAvoidair bubbles in flow path
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the pressure in the recovery tank during different phases of the filling process. Specifically, the pressure is controlled to be less than atmospheric pressure during the initial filling phase to improve filling efficiency, then switched to greater than atmospheric pressure when the meniscus breaks to prevent air bubble ingestion. This temporal variation of pressure parameters resolves the contradiction between filling efficiency and air bubble prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action by dividing the filling process into distinct periods with different pressure conditions. The first period uses depressurization to fill the flow path efficiently, while the second period uses pressurization to prevent air bubble entry. This periodic switching between different pressure states allows the system to achieve both high filling efficiency and reliable operation without air bubbles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If the meniscus of the liquid is broken to allow liquid to reach the recovery flow path, then the filling process is completed, but air bubbles are drawn into the flow path

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling process completionVSAvoidejection failure prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by breaking the meniscus in advance during the first period when the liquid level is sufficient, before the liquid reaches the recovery flow path. This preliminary meniscus breaking allows the liquid to fill the recovery flow path without creating a pressure differential that would draw air bubbles in during the subsequent ejection phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by establishing a cushion of liquid in the recovery flow path before the ejection process begins. By ensuring the liquid reaches the recovery flow path during the filling period and maintaining appropriate pressure conditions, the system creates a protective liquid cushion that prevents air bubbles from being drawn into the flow path during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively prevents air bubbles from entering the flow path, ensuring a stable ink supply and preventing ejection failures, while maintaining efficient filling and circulation processes.

Implementation Method 1

a pressurizing mechanism IM that pressurizes the inside of the supply tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

a depressurizing mechanism DM that depressurizes the inside of the recovery tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Depressurisation

Implementation Method 3

Pm indicates a pressure at which the meniscus of the liquid formed in the nozzle is broken

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension: Surface Tension

Data Source

PatentUS12296595B2Liquid ejecting apparatus and liquid filling method
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US12296595B2 patent drawing
  • US12296595B2 patent drawing
  • US12296595B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid ejecting apparatus includes a liquid ejection head, a supply tank, a recovery tank, a supply flow path, a recovery flow path, a pressurizing mechanism pressurizing the inside of the supply tank, and a depressurizing mechanism depressurizing the inside of the recovery tank. A filling period, in which a filling process is performed to fill, with the liquid, a nozzle, the supply flow path, and the recovery flow path, includes a period that is after a meniscus is formed in the nozzle and before the liquid reaches the recovery flow path. In the period, the pressurizing and the depressurizing mechanisms are driven; and in the period, Pt_out>−|Pm| is satisfied, where Pm indicates a pressure at which the meniscus is broken and Pt_out indicates a pressure in the recovery tank.