Selective Kogation Removal in Liquid Ejection Heads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for cleaning liquid ejection heads fail to selectively remove kogation from individual liquid chambers, leading to uneven ejection characteristics due to uniform electrochemical reactions across all chambers, despite varying conditions of kogation deposition.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a liquid ejection head with a coating layer that undergoes an electrochemical reaction, where a voltage is applied to selectively elute the coating layer into the liquid, allowing for controlled temperature changes in each chamber to remove kogation based on specific deposition conditions, thereby addressing the uneven kogation distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If uniform electrochemical reaction is applied to all liquid chambers, then cleaning process is simplified, but kogation removal effectiveness decreases due to uneven deposition conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning process complexityVSAvoidkogation removal effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by enabling independent temperature control for each liquid chamber. The temperature control unit adjusts temperatures selectively based on the specific kogation deposition conditions of each chamber, allowing tailored electrochemical reactions that match local requirements rather than applying uniform treatment to all chambers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the cleaning process by dividing the plurality of liquid chambers into groups or individuals that require different temperature conditions. The temperature control unit can independently adjust temperatures for different chambers or groups, enabling customized electrochemical reactions for each segment based on their specific kogation characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If temperature is uniformly maintained across all liquid chambers, then system control is simplified, but ejection characteristics deteriorate due to varying kogation deposition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control complexityVSAvoidejection performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality in temperature control by allowing each liquid chamber to operate at its optimal temperature based on kogation deposition levels. Chambers with heavier deposition can be maintained at higher temperatures to prevent further accumulation, while chambers with lighter deposition operate at lower temperatures, optimizing ejection characteristics for each local condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by enabling real-time adjustment of temperatures in different liquid chambers based on their operational conditions and kogation deposition states. The temperature control unit dynamically modifies temperature settings to match changing requirements, ensuring optimal ejection performance under varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables selective and effective removal of kogation, stabilizing foaming and maintaining optimal ejection characteristics by controlling temperature and electrochemical reactions in each liquid chamber, improving print quality and ejection speed.

Implementation Method 1

applying a voltage to the coating layer to provoke an electrochemical reaction between the coating layer and the liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reaction: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 2

the heat generating resistive element is made to generate heat, the liquid is heated suddenly and foams in a liquid contact area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 3

the liquid is heated suddenly and foams in a liquid contact area (i.e., a thermal action portion) located above the heat generating resistive element. Foaming produces pressure with which the liquid is ejected from ejection ports

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFoaming: Foam

Data Source

PatentUS9346274B2Method for cleaning liquid ejection head
Publication Date: 2016.05.24 CANON KK
  • US9346274B2 patent drawing
  • US9346274B2 patent drawing
  • US9346274B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for cleaning a liquid ejection head which includes applying a voltage to a coating layer of the liquid ejection head to cause the coating layer to be eluted in a liquid so that kogation deposited on a coating layer is removed. When removing kogation deposited on the coating layer, temperatures of the liquids in the liquid chambers are selectively changed among a plurality of liquid chambers.