Liquid Holding Apparatus with Variable Peel Strength Seal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Point-of-care urine dipstick testing by nurses often lacks suitable refrigeration for in-vitro diagnostic products, requiring controls with extended room temperature stability and portability, and existing liquid holding apparatuses are prone to spilling and costly to manufacture.

Innovation Solution

A liquid holding apparatus with a detachable transparent or translucent front wall and a stronger seal below the access section, allowing easy insertion of test devices and minimizing liquid spillage, featuring a lamination structure with varying peel strengths to ensure stability and ease of use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a liquid holding apparatus is designed with a detachable front wall for easy access, then ease of operation is improved, but the risk of liquid spillage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of accessVSAvoidspillage resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The liquid holding apparatus is divided into separate sections with the front wall detachable from the rear wall, allowing easy access while maintaining liquid containment through the sealed connection between sections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The front wall is made transparent or translucent in specific portions to allow visual inspection of the test device, providing localized transparency where needed while maintaining overall containment integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If a strong seal is applied throughout the liquid holding apparatus, then spillage resistance is improved, but ease of access deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespillage resistanceVSAvoidease of access
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The seal is segmented into different regions with varying strengths: a first seal region with lower peel strength for easy detachment and a second seal region with higher peel strength for secure liquid containment, allowing both easy access and spillage resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the front wall have different seal strengths, with the first seal region providing easy access and the second seal region providing secure containment, creating local quality variations in the seal structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Stability of the object's composition

If refrigeration is provided for quality control material, then stability is improved, but portability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature stabilityVSAvoidportability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The quality control material is formulated to maintain stability at elevated temperatures without refrigeration, changing the temperature parameter requirement from cold storage to room temperature storage, thereby enabling portability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10712283B2Liquid holding apparatus for insertion of a test device into a test liquid
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 QUANTIMETRIX
  • US10712283B2 patent drawing
  • US10712283B2 patent drawing
  • US10712283B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid holding liquid holding apparatus for insertion of a test device into a test liquid, the liquid holding apparatus having a) a liquid holding device for holding test liquid; and b) test liquid in the liquid holding device. The liquid holding device has a front wall and a rear wall. The upper section of the liquid holding device has an access section where the front wall can be detached from the rear wall to allow access for a test strip test device. At least a portion of the front wall is substantially transparent or translucent. The front wall is attached to the rear wall at the access section by a first lamination and the front wall is attached to the rear wall below the access section by a second lamination. The peel strength of the second lamination is greater than the peel strength of the first lamination.