Liquid Lens Stabilizing Feature Impact Emulsion Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Liquid lenses with immiscible fluids are prone to emulsification under impact or shock loads, leading to undesirable optical performance due to localized pressure drops and potential cavitation.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a stabilizing feature in the substrates, such as a region of reduced thickness forming a membrane, to increase stiffness and mitigate localized pressure drops during impacts, thereby preventing emulsification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the substrate is made thinner to reduce overall lens size, then the lens becomes more compact, but the substrate stiffness decreases leading to larger deflections and increased emulsification risk under impact loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelens sizeVSAvoidsubstrate stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate is designed with non-uniform thickness: thinner in peripheral regions to reduce overall lens size and heavier in the central region to maintain stiffness where it is most needed. This local variation in geometric properties resolves the contradiction between compactness and structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate incorporates a composite structure combining regions of different thicknesses, effectively creating a composite mechanical system that achieves both reduced mass/volume and maintained stiffness through strategic material distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If the substrate is made stiffer to prevent emulsification under impact loads, then emulsion resistance improves, but substrate deflections are reduced which may affect the lens's ability to respond to electro-wetting actuation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemulsion resistanceVSAvoidelectro-wetting response
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate exhibits spatially varying stiffness: stiffer in the central region to prevent emulsification under impact, while maintaining appropriate flexibility in other regions to allow electro-wetting actuation to function properly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate is designed to exhibit different mechanical behaviors under different loading conditions: resistant to static impact loads (preventing emulsion) while remaining dynamically responsive to the smaller forces generated by electro-wetting actuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the membrane thickness is reduced to improve flexibility for electro-wetting operation, then actuation responsiveness improves, but the membrane becomes more susceptible to excessive deflection under impact loads causing emulsification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation responsivenessVSAvoidimpact-induced emulsification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The membrane is designed with non-uniform thickness characteristics, being thinner in regions where flexibility is needed for actuation while maintaining sufficient thickness in impact-prone areas to resist excessive deflection and prevent emulsification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively reduces the likelihood of emulsification by minimizing substrate deflections and pressure variations within the lens, ensuring improved optical performance and resistance to shock loads.

Implementation Method 1

a stabilizing feature determining that in response to an impact load on the assembled liquid lens that would cause localized pressure drops of maximum magnitude X in the absence of the stabilizing feature, the maximum magnitude of localized pressure drops within the liquid lens is smaller than X

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStiffness:

Implementation Method 2

the stabilizing feature comprises the top or bottom substrate having a region of reduced thickness t, forming a membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9952358B2Method to prevent emulsion in a liquid lens
Publication Date: 2018.04.24 CORNING INC
  • US9952358B2 patent drawing
  • US9952358B2 patent drawing
  • US9952358B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments generally relate to methods for preventing the formation of an emulsion in a liquid lens. In one embodiment, the method comprises fabricating a top substrate, a bottom substrate, and a central substrate including a cavity configured to be filled by first and second liquids. The liquid lens comprising the top substrate, the bottom substrate and the central substrate is assembled, with at least one of the top substrate and the bottom substrate in the assembled liquid lens being characterized by a stabilizing feature determining that in response to an impact load on the assembled liquid lens that would cause localized pressure drops of maximum magnitude X in the absence of the stabilizing feature, the maximum magnitude of localized pressure drops within the liquid lens is smaller than X.