Liquid Level Detector Clearance Design for Foreign Substance Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing liquid level detectors face issues with fine foreign substances accumulating around the revolving shaft, causing the arm to malfunction due to clogged clearances, which complicates the route from the outside to the revolving shaft.

Innovation Solution

A liquid level detector design featuring a rotator with a resin body, a magnet, and a magnetic sensor, where the clearance between the supporter and the magnet is larger than other clearances, preventing large foreign substances from reaching the magnet and utilizing a sliding opposing wall as a bearing to generate a moment for rotation, even with foreign substances caught in other clearances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the route from outside to the revolving shaft is complicated with steps and projecting portions, then metal powders are prevented from reaching the revolving shaft, but fine foreign substances can still reach and accumulate around the revolving shaft causing clearance clogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetal powder preventionVSAvoidarm revolution reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the protective structure into multiple segments: the body with its step portion, the holder with projecting portions, the cover with its projecting portions, and the opposing wall. Each segment creates a separate barrier that collectively prevents foreign substances from reaching the revolving shaft, addressing the limitation of previous single-structure approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces the cover as an intermediary component between the outer environment and the revolving shaft. The cover with its projecting portions creates an additional barrier that intercepts foreign substances before they can reach the holder and revolving shaft, enhancing the protective function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the clearance between the supporter and magnet is made smaller to prevent foreign substance entry, then foreign substances are blocked, but the arm cannot rotate due to friction and moment requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforeign substance blockingVSAvoidarm rotation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different clearance sizes at different locations: the clearance between the cover and holder is small to block foreign substances, while the clearance between the holder and revolving shaft is larger to allow rotation. This local differentiation of clearance quality enables both protection and operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves the bearing function from the rotation center (revolving shaft) to the outer circumference (opposing wall). This dimensional relocation allows the arm to rotate about the revolving shaft while the opposing wall provides bearing support at a distance, generating sufficient moment to overcome friction in the blocked clearances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Volume of moving object

If the opposing wall is positioned closer to the rotation center to reduce size, then the magnet can be smaller, but insufficient moment is generated to rotate the arm against foreign substance friction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnet sizeVSAvoidrotation moment
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent relocates the bearing function from the rotation center to the outer circumference by positioning the opposing wall at a distance from the revolving shaft. This dimensional change increases the moment arm length, generating sufficient rotation moment to overcome friction caused by foreign substances in the blocked clearances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively prevents foreign substances from interfering with the arm's rotation, ensuring reliable operation by storing foreign substances or adsorbing them with the magnet, thus maintaining the detector's functionality.

Implementation Method 1

a magnet fixed to the rotator; a magnetic sensor covered by the supporter and configured to output a signal corresponding to a rotation of the magnet opposing the magnetic sensor via the supporter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

the opposing wall and the outer circumference wall are opposed to each other on an outer circumference side of the magnet. According to this configuration, the opposing wall, which functions as the bearing, may be disposed at a position distant from the rotation center of the rotator... a relatively large moment may be generated at the opposing wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS9772213B2Liquid level detector
Publication Date: 2017.09.26 AISAN IND CO LTD
  • US9772213B2 patent drawing
  • US9772213B2 patent drawing
  • US9772213B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid level detector may include a rotator fixed to an arm, a magnet fixed to the rotator, and a supporter rotatably supporting the rotator. The supporter may include a body, and an outer circumference wall disposed along a rotation direction of the arm on an outer circumference side of the magnet. The rotator may include a cover covering an end part of the outer circumference wall, and an opposing wall opposing at least one of an inner circumference surface and an outer circumference surface of the outer circumference wall. A first clearance between the supporter and the magnet may communicate with an outer space via a second clearance between the outer circumference wall and the cover and a third clearance between the outer circumference wall and the opposing wall. The first clearance may be larger than at least one of the second clearance and the third clearance.