Liquid-Level Header for Valve-Free Condenser Flow Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current split condenser systems rely on valves and flow control devices that increase cost, complexity, and potential failure points, complicating refrigerant flow management.

Innovation Solution

A liquid level in a header is used to block vapor communication with condensers, eliminating the need for flow control devices and allowing for efficient control of cooling capacity by selectively distributing cooling media.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If valves and flow control devices are used to stop or limit refrigerant flow into condensers, then cooling capacity control is achieved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacity controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes valves and flow control devices from the system entirely, extracting the problematic components that caused complexity. Instead of using mechanical valves to control refrigerant flow, the system relies on natural two-phase flow dynamics and pressure differential to achieve cooling capacity control, thereby eliminating the sources of device complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses self-regulating two-phase flow dynamics where the refrigerant automatically distributes itself to condensers based on system conditions. The pressure differential and phase change characteristics enable automatic flow control without external mechanical intervention, allowing the system to self-adjust cooling capacity without complex valve mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If valves and flow control devices are installed to manage refrigerant flow, then cooling distribution is controlled, but potential failure points increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling distribution controlVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By completely removing valves and flow control devices from the refrigerant distribution system, the patent eliminates the mechanical components that serve as potential failure points. The system achieves reliable cooling distribution through passive two-phase flow mechanisms that have no moving parts to fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical valve-based flow control system with a physics-based two-phase flow distribution mechanism. This substitution eliminates mechanical wear, sealing failures, and actuation problems associated with valves, achieving more reliable refrigerant distribution through natural fluid dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If valves are used to control refrigerant flow, then cooling capacity can be adjusted, but cost and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacity adjustmentVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates valves and flow control devices from the system, removing the need for expensive mechanical components and their associated maintenance. The cooling capacity adjustment is achieved through simpler, more cost-effective means using natural two-phase flow behavior and system pressure dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the inherent properties of two-phase refrigerant flow to automatically adjust cooling capacity based on system conditions. This self-regulating behavior eliminates the need for expensive valve actuators, control systems, and maintenance, achieving cost-effective adaptability through physics-based automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the cooling system, reduces costs, and minimizes failure points by eliminating the need for valves while enhancing cooling capacity control.

Implementation Method 1

By using a liquid level in a header to block vapor communication with a condenser

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic barrier / Liquid seal:

Implementation Method 2

a heat source to transfer heat to a cooling media

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

cooling media can be in a first phase when entering the header and in a second phase when exiting the header

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS20250389486A1Liquid valving condenser header
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 VERTIV CORP
  • US20250389486A1 patent drawing
  • US20250389486A1 patent drawing
  • US20250389486A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A closed loop cooling system can include a first condenser having a first inlet to receive a cooling media for removing heat from a heat source, a second condenser having a second inlet to receive the cooling media, and a header for being plumbed between a heat source and the condensers. The second condenser can be plumbed in parallel with the first condenser. The header can receive the cooling media from the heat source and selectively distribute the cooling media to either or both of the condensers. The header can have a first outlet fluidically coupled to the first inlet and a second outlet fluidically coupled to the second inlet. The second outlet can be located on the header at a lower elevation than the first outlet.