Automated Liquid-Liquid Extraction via Conductivity-Guided Dynamic Suction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing liquid-liquid extraction methods are time-consuming, error-prone, and lack reproducibility, especially for large-volume analyses and syntheses, and current automated systems face challenges with phase separation and require significant footprints.

Innovation Solution

An automated liquid-liquid extraction method using a device with a conductivity sensor to determine phase differences, allowing for controlled suction at varying speeds and distances to ensure gentle phase separation, suitable for larger volumes, and incorporating a computer program for optimized phase boundary determination and extraction aid addition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual extraction methods are used, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but time consumption increases and reproducibility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of extraction processVSAvoidextraction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The extraction device automatically performs phase separation and solvent removal without requiring continuous manual intervention. The system self-regulates the extraction process through automated pumping, phase separation in the separation chamber, and solvent evaporation, thereby reducing operational time while maintaining consistency and reproducibility across multiple extractions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Quantity of substance

If conventional automated extraction systems are used, then automation is achieved, but they cannot handle large volumes and require large footprints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction volumeVSAvoiddevice footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The device transitions from horizontal phase separation to vertical phase separation by orienting the separation chamber vertically. This dimensional change allows the system to handle larger volumes of liquid phases without proportionally increasing the device's horizontal footprint, as the separation occurs along the vertical axis rather than requiring extensive horizontal space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The extraction device is divided into distinct functional modules: a mixing chamber for phase mixing, a separation chamber for phase separation, and an evaporation chamber for solvent removal. This segmentation allows each module to be optimized for its specific function and enables the system to process large volumes efficiently without requiring a uniformly large device footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If fast suction is used to speed up extraction, then productivity increases, but phase boundary disruption occurs and extraction precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction speedVSAvoidphase separation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The suction speed is dynamically adjusted during the extraction process. The system initially applies higher suction speed to rapidly remove the upper phase and increase productivity, then automatically reduces the suction speed as the phase boundary approaches the suction inlet. This dynamic speed adjustment ensures complete phase separation while preventing disruption of the phase boundary, thereby maintaining both high productivity and precise phase separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback control through conductivity sensors that continuously monitor the phase boundary position. Based on the sensor feedback, the control system automatically adjusts the suction speed to maintain optimal separation conditions. This feedback mechanism ensures that the suction speed is reduced when the phase boundary approaches, preventing mixing while maximizing extraction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method enables efficient, reproducible, and precise extraction of components from large volumes, reducing errors and operational time, while minimizing the risk of phase boundary disruption and allowing for multiple extractions with the same solution.

Implementation Method 1

determining a conductivity difference ΔList between the hydrophilic phase and the hydrophobic phase using a conductivity sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConductivity measurement: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

The upper phase is extracted at at least two different speeds v1 to vn, wherein the last speed vn is slower than a previous speed vn−1

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Implementation Method 3

The solvent should have a similar polarity to the component to be extracted and a sufficient difference in density to the substance mixture or extraction material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity difference: Density Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS20240416258A1Method for an automatic liquid-liquid extraction
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 METROHM AG
  • US20240416258A1 patent drawing
  • US20240416258A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for automated liquid-liquid extraction. The method comprises the steps of:i) providing an extraction device,ii) providing a vessel with a hydrophilic phase and a hydrophobic phase, wherein at least one component to be extracted is contained in one of the two phases,iii) determining a conductivity difference ΔList between the hydrophilic phase and the hydrophobic phase using a conductivity sensor.The upper phase is extracted at at least two different speeds v1 to vn, wherein the last speed vn is slower than a previous speed vn−1, preferably slower than v1 to vn−1.