Liquid panel assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional liquid-to-air membrane energy exchangers face issues with membrane bulge and pressure drop due to high pumping pressure, leading to inefficiencies and potential leaks, and the flow of desiccant through filler materials is uncontrolled, resulting in uneven distribution and flow irregularities.

Innovation Solution

A liquid panel assembly with a support frame and counterflow passages that offset hydrostatic pressure with friction pressure loss, featuring a set of flow passages connected to inlet and outlet channels, which are configured to direct liquid flow and reduce pressure within the assembly, thereby minimizing membrane bulge and ensuring uniform flow distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high pumping pressure is used to force desiccant flow through the solution panel, then the desiccant can overcome static head pressure and friction, but the membranes bulge outwardly and leaks occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesiccant flow rateVSAvoidmembrane integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional upward flow direction by implementing downward desiccant flow through the solution panel. This gravitational assistance eliminates the need for high pumping pressure, thereby preventing membrane bulge and leaks while maintaining adequate desiccant flow rate through the panel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses gravity as a counterweight force to offset the static head pressure that normally requires high pumping pressure to overcome. By flowing desiccant downward, the gravitational force acts in the same direction as the desired flow, reducing the net pressure required and protecting membrane integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Shape

If support structures are added to limit membrane bulge, then membrane deformation is reduced, but the support structures block membrane transfer area and increase pressure drop

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemembrane flatnessVSAvoidmembrane transfer area
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding support structures to counteract bulge, the patent inverts the flow direction to prevent bulge formation in the first place. The downward flow under low pressure eliminates the outward bowing force, allowing the membrane to remain flat without requiring internal support structures that would block transfer area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Ease of operation

If wide air channels are used to accommodate membrane bulge, then air flow restriction is avoided, but heat and moisture transfer resistance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair flow顺畅度VSAvoidheat and moisture transfer resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses air channel width issues by inverting the desiccant flow direction, which prevents membrane bulge and eliminates the need for wide air channels. The downward low-pressure flow keeps membranes flat, allowing narrow air channels that minimize transfer resistance while maintaining adequate air flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces total pressure within the liquid panel assembly, minimizing membrane bulge and leaks, and achieves uniform desiccant flow distribution across the membrane, enhancing the energy exchange efficiency and reducing operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

The fluid circuits are configured to offset hydrostatic pressure gain with friction pressure loss of the liquid that flows within the one or more fluid circuits to reduce pressure within the liquid panel assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrostatic pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The fluid circuits are configured to offset hydrostatic pressure gain with friction pressure loss of the liquid that flows within the one or more fluid circuits to reduce pressure within the liquid panel assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction pressure loss: Friction

Implementation Method 3

In general, a LAMEE transfers heat and moisture between a liquid desiccant solution and air through a thin flexible membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer through membrane: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 4

In general, a LAMEE transfers heat and moisture between a liquid desiccant solution and air through a thin flexible membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoisture transfer through membrane: Permeation

Data Source

PatentUS9816760B2Liquid panel assembly
Publication Date: 2017.11.14 NORTEK AIR SOLUTIONS CANADA INC
  • US9816760B2 patent drawing
  • US9816760B2 patent drawing
  • US9816760B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid panel assembly configured to be used with an energy exchanger may include a support frame having one or more fluid circuits and at least one membrane secured to the support frame. Each of the fluid circuits may include an inlet channel connected to an outlet channel through one or more flow passages. A liquid is configured to flow through the fluid circuits and contact interior surfaces of the membrane(s). The fluid circuits are configured to at least partially offset liquid hydrostatic pressure with friction loss of the liquid flowing within the fluid circuits to minimize, eliminate, or otherwise reduce pressure within the liquid panel assembly.