Liquid-Philic and Phobic Surfaces for Critical Heat Flux

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The 'boiling crisis' phenomenon, characterized by a significant reduction in heat flux due to the formation of a continuous vapor layer on heat transfer surfaces, limits thermal performance in industries relying on nucleate boiling, such as power generation, desalination, and nuclear reactors, leading to increased energy costs and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

The use of liquid-philic and liquid-phobic surfaces, where nucleate boiling occurs on a separate liquid-phobic surface while condensation takes place on a heterogeneous surface with both liquid-philic and liquid-phobic regions, decouples the heating and boiling processes, preventing the formation of a continuous vapor layer and enhancing critical heat flux.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If nucleate boiling is used to transfer heat efficiently, then heat transfer coefficient increases, but beyond critical heat flux a continuous vapor layer forms causing severe heat transfer limitation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer coefficientVSAvoidheat transfer stability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the heat transfer surface into hydrophilic regions (for stable heating) and hydrophobic regions (for bubble nucleation). This spatial segmentation allows simultaneous achievement of high heat transfer coefficients and prevention of vapor layer formation, resolving the contradiction between power and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the heat transfer surface are assigned different wetting properties: hydrophilic regions provide stable thermal contact while hydrophobic regions promote bubble formation. This local quality differentiation enables the system to maintain both high heat transfer efficiency and operational reliability beyond critical heat flux.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If heat flux is increased to improve thermal performance, then heat transfer efficiency increases, but boiling crisis occurs leading to orders of magnitude reduction in heat flux

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal performanceVSAvoidboiling crisis
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The hydrophobic regions are pre-configured on the heat transfer surface to anticipate and prevent vapor layer formation. This preliminary anti-action against boiling crisis allows the system to operate at high heat flux levels without experiencing the harmful abrupt reduction in heat transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the potentially harmful vapor layer formation into a beneficial mechanism by using hydrophobic regions to control bubble nucleation. Instead of allowing uncontrolled vapor layer formation that causes boiling crisis, the hydrophobic regions promote controlled bubble detachment that enhances heat transfer while preventing thermal instability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If separate liquid-philic and liquid-phobic surfaces are used for heating and boiling, then critical heat flux is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecritical heat fluxVSAvoidsurface configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the heating function and boiling function into a single integrated heat transfer surface with patterned hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions. This merging eliminates the need for separate heating and boiling surfaces, reducing device complexity while maintaining improved critical heat flux performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly improves critical heat flux, reduces energy costs, and enhances safety by preventing 'boiling crisis' and wall superheat, enabling more efficient boiling and condensation processes across various industrial applications.

Implementation Method 1

nucleation on the liquid-phobic surface occurs to produce a vapor from the liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNucleation: Nucleation

Implementation Method 2

a condensing surface for condensing vapors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS11236956B2Method for improving critical heat flux
Publication Date: 2022.02.01 BOARD OF REGENTS FOR THE OKLAHOMA AGRI & MECHANICAL COLLEGE ACTING FOR & ON BEHALF OF OKLAHOMA STATE UNIV
  • US11236956B2 patent drawing
  • US11236956B2 patent drawing
  • US11236956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are disclosed which utilize liquid-philic surfaces and liquid-phobic surfaces to more safely and efficiently boil liquids and/or condense vapors. The methods and systems generally utilize two separated surfaces for nucleate boiling, where one of the surfaces is liquid-philic and the other is liquid-phobic. The methods and systems can utilize a condensing surface for condensing vapors, where the condensing surface can have liquid-philic regions and liquid-phobic regions.