Pipe diameter determination method, pipe diameter determination apparatus, and refrigerating apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Refrigeration apparatuses face challenges in optimizing pipe diameters of connection pipes, leading to inefficient refrigerant usage and pressure loss, as they are typically designed uniformly regardless of cooling and heating capacities, which can result in excessive refrigerant charging and increased pressure loss during heating operations.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine the pipe diameter of the liquid-side connection pipe based on the cooling and heating capacities of the refrigeration apparatus, using a cooling-heating ratio to adjust the pipe diameter dynamically, allowing for reduced refrigerant charging while maintaining acceptable pressure loss, especially during heating operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the pipe diameter of the liquid-side connection pipe is determined uniformly regardless of cooling and heating capacities, then the design is simple and easy to implement, but the refrigerant charging amount increases and pressure loss occurs during heating operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe diameter determination methodVSAvoidrefrigerant charging amount
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by determining pipe diameter based on the cooling-heating ratio parameter. Instead of using a fixed uniform diameter, the liquid-side connection pipe diameter is selected according to the specific cooling and heating capacity parameters of the system, allowing optimization of refrigerant flow characteristics for different operational modes while reducing overall refrigerant charging requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If the pipe diameter of the liquid-side connection pipe is determined uniformly regardless of cooling and heating capacities, then the installation process is simplified, but pressure loss increases during heating operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation processVSAvoidpressure loss during heating
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the design parameter from fixed uniform diameter to variable diameter based on cooling-heating ratio. This allows the liquid-side connection pipe to have optimized dimensions that reduce pressure loss during heating operations while maintaining ease of installation through standardized pipe size selections from a defined set of options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If a larger pipe diameter is used for the liquid-side connection pipe, then pressure loss during heating operations is reduced, but the refrigerant charging amount increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure loss during heatingVSAvoidrefrigerant charging amount
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the balance between pressure loss and refrigerant quantity by using the cooling-heating ratio as a determining parameter. This allows selection of the minimum necessary pipe diameter that achieves acceptable pressure loss during heating while avoiding excessive refrigerant charging, thereby resolving the trade-off between these two parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If the pipe diameter is reduced based on cooling and heating capacities, then refrigerant charging amount is reduced, but the design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefrigerant charging amountVSAvoidpipe diameter determination method
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages design complexity by introducing a clear parameter-based methodology using cooling-heating ratio. While the determination method becomes more sophisticated than uniform sizing, it provides a systematic approach with defined calculation steps and standardized pipe size selections, making the increased complexity manageable and beneficial for optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11105620B2Pipe diameter determination method, pipe diameter determination apparatus, and refrigerating apparatus
Publication Date: 2021.08.31 DAIKIN INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US11105620B2 patent drawing
  • US11105620B2 patent drawing
  • US11105620B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a pipe diameter of a liquid-side connection pipe in a refrigeration apparatus includes causing a computer to obtain a heating capacity, maximum heating load, and maximum cooling load; causing the computer to determine a pipe diameter of the liquid-side connection pipe by reducing a reference pipe diameter based on either a value obtained by dividing the maximum heating load by the maximum cooling load or a value obtained by subtracting the maximum heating load from the heating capacity; and installing the refrigeration apparatus using the liquid-side connection pipe having the determined pipe diameter.