Literary Recommendation Engine Using Deep Semantic Clustering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current book recommendation engines fail to accurately match users' preferences for literary elements and content patterns across books, relying on shallow analysis and arbitrary ratings rather than deep semantic analysis of literary content.

Innovation Solution

A deep semantic analysis platform is used to identify and quantify literary elements, such as humor and drama, and their significance within digital works of literature, enabling the creation of cluster models that can be compared to recommend books with similar patterns and user-preferred content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If shallow analysis and arbitrary ratings are used for book recommendations, then the system is simpler and faster, but the recommendation accuracy is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidanalysis depth
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments literary works into multiple dimensions including literary elements (humor, drama, mystery), structural patterns (chapter organization, narrative flow), and thematic categories. Each dimension is analyzed separately through clustering algorithms, allowing deep analysis while maintaining system manageability through modular processing of different literary attributes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional shallow rating systems to a multi-dimensional analysis framework that incorporates literary elements, structural patterns, and thematic characteristics. This dimensional expansion enables accurate recommendation matching by considering multiple aspects of literary works simultaneously rather than relying on single-dimension ratings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If deep semantic analysis of literary content is performed, then recommendation accuracy improves, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent matching accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis by pre-processing literary works to extract and cluster literary elements, structural patterns, and thematic characteristics before recommendation is needed. This pre-computation of literary profiles allows fast matching during actual recommendation queries without performing complex analysis in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified cluster models and literary profiles that capture essential characteristics of works without storing the complete original texts. These condensed representations serve as copies that can be rapidly compared and matched, reducing processing time while maintaining recommendation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If cluster models are created to represent literary works, then the ability to compare and recommend improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation capabilityVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal cluster modeling framework that can represent multiple aspects of literary works (literary elements, structural patterns, themes) using the same basic clustering methodology. This multi-functional approach allows the system to handle diverse literary attributes through a single unified structure, reducing overall system complexity while enhancing recommendation versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11093507B2Recommendation engine using inferred deep similarities for works of literature
Publication Date: 2021.08.17 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11093507B2 patent drawing
  • US11093507B2 patent drawing
  • US11093507B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A recommendation engine for works of literature uses patterns of flow and element similarities for scoring a first user-rated work of literature against one or more recommendation candidate works of literature. Cluster models are created using meta-data modeling the works of literature, the meta-data having literary element categories and instances within each category. Each instance is described by an index value (position in the literature) and significance value (e.g. weight or significance). Cluster finding process(es) invoked for each instance in each category find Similarity Concept clusters and Consistency Trend clusters, which are recorded into the cluster models representing each work of literature. The cluster model can be printed or displayed so that a user can visually understand the ebb and flow of each literary element in the literature, and may be digitally compared to other cluster models of other works of literature for potential recommendation to a user.