Literary Work Signatures for Sparse Data Recommendations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing recommendation systems fail to provide meaningful recommendations for self-published books and sparsely read literary works due to the lack of user ratings and reviews, as they rely heavily on user data which is scarce for such works.

Innovation Solution

A machine-learning based recommendation system that extracts information from literary works using natural language processing techniques, encodes it into graphs, and generates signatures to compare and rank literary works based on quality, allowing for personalized and generic recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If recommendation systems rely on user ratings and purchase histories, then they can provide personalized recommendations for popular books, but they fail to provide meaningful recommendations for self-published books with scarce user data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoiduser data availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces literary work signatures as an intermediary representation that mediates between the literary work content and the recommendation system. These signatures encode structural and thematic features of books, enabling comparison and recommendation without relying on scarce user ratings. The signatures act as a bridge that allows the system to infer book quality and similarity from the works themselves rather than from limited user feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional collaborative filtering mechanism (which relies on user behavior data) with a content-based analysis system using natural language processing and graph encoding. Instead of mechanically aggregating user ratings and purchase histories, the system uses computational linguistics to extract and compare literary features, substituting the data-driven mechanical approach with a knowledge-driven analytical approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system analyzes literary works using natural language processing and graph encoding, then it can generate quality signatures for self-published books, but this increases processing complexity and computational resources required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to self-published booksVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the literary analysis process into distinct components: entity extraction (identifying characters, locations, objects), relationship extraction (identifying interactions between entities), graph encoding (structuring extracted information), and signature generation (creating compact representations). This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and facilitates parallel processing, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms unstructured literary text into structured graph representations with specific parameters (entity types, relationship types, interaction frequencies). By changing the parameter representation from raw text to structured graphical features, the system enables efficient comparison and signature generation. This parameter transformation reduces the complexity of subsequent analysis operations while preserving the essential literary characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the system generates and compares literary work signatures, then it can provide diverse and accurate recommendations without user ratings, but this requires advanced machine learning techniques and natural language processing capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation qualityVSAvoidsystem technical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis by pre-computing literary work signatures for all books in the catalog before recommendation requests arrive. This preliminary action includes extracting entities, building relationship graphs, and generating signature vectors in advance. When a recommendation request comes in, the system only needs to compare pre-computed signatures rather than performing full NLP analysis, significantly reducing real-time computational requirements while maintaining high recommendation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11599822B1Generation and use of literary work signatures reflective of entity relationships
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US11599822B1 patent drawing
  • US11599822B1 patent drawing
  • US11599822B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system and process extract information from a literary work regarding relationships between entities (e.g., characters, locations, etc.) described or represented in the literary work, and generate a graph representing these relationships. The graph data is parsed into sub-graphs, and the subgraphs are used to generate a signature of the literary work. The respective signatures of different literary works may be compared for purposes of generating literary work recommendations for users.