Machining Lithium Metasilicate Ceramic with Diamond Tools

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dental ceramic materials face challenges in achieving a balance between easy machinability for quick production of dental restorations and maintaining high strength and chemical durability, particularly with lithium disilicate materials that exhibit high wear and long processing times during machining, and significant shrinkage during sintering.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a metastable lithium metasilicate glass ceramic that can be easily machined using diamond tools with specific grain sizes and machining strategies, followed by a heat treatment to convert it into a lithium disilicate glass ceramic with enhanced mechanical and optical properties, minimizing shrinkage and tool wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If lithium disilicate materials are used for dental restorations, then high strength and chemical durability are achieved, but machining time increases and tool wear becomes very high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidmachining time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a heat treatment step before machining to create a softened state of the lithium disilicate material. This preliminary heat treatment reduces the material's hardness and strength temporarily, enabling easy machining with standard tools. After machining, a final heat treatment restores the material's high strength properties, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of machining and final strength requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by controlling temperature to alter the material properties of lithium disilicate. During machining, the material is maintained at elevated temperatures (below its transformation point) to reduce its strength and improve machinability. After machining, cooling and final heat treatment restore the material to its high-strength state, effectively changing physical parameters to resolve the contradiction between machinability and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If lithium disilicate materials are used for dental restorations, then high strength is achieved, but tool wear becomes very high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidtool wear
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a heat treatment step before machining to create a softened state of the lithium disilicate material. This preliminary heat treatment reduces the material's hardness and strength temporarily, enabling easy machining with standard tools. After machining, a final heat treatment restores the material's high strength properties, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of machining and final strength requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by controlling temperature to alter the material properties of lithium disilicate. During machining, the material is maintained at elevated temperatures (below its transformation point) to reduce its strength and improve machinability. After machining, cooling and final heat treatment restore the material to its high-strength state, effectively changing physical parameters to resolve the contradiction between machinability and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If ceramic materials are machined in green state to achieve easy machinability, then machining time is reduced, but shrinkage during sintering becomes drastic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining timeVSAvoiddimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by controlling temperature to alter the material properties of lithium disilicate. During machining, the material is maintained at elevated temperatures (below its transformation point) to reduce its strength and improve machinability. After machining, cooling and final heat treatment restore the material to its high-strength state, effectively changing physical parameters to resolve the contradiction between machinability and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces machining time while maintaining strength, accuracy, and dimensional integrity, achieving high-strength, chemically stable, and optically appealing dental restorations with minimal shrinkage.

Implementation Method 1

A machining strategy for machining a dental ceramic blank into a dental article is provided

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

a heat treatment to convert it into a lithium disilicate glass ceramic with enhanced mechanical and optical properties

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentEP2298228B1A method of reducing the time for machining a dental ceramic blank
Publication Date: 2012.05.23 IVOCLAR VIVADENT AG
  • EP2298228B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2298228B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2298228B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method of reducing the time for machining a dental ceramic blank, wherein the fracture toughness (Klc) and the flexural strength (σf) of the dental ceramic material are known, comprising calculating an estimate of the maximal surface critical flaw size and an estimate of the maximal volume critical flaw size of the dental ceramic using the following formula: c=Kl⁢c/σf2 wherein c is the maximal surface critical flaw size and 2c is the maximal volume critical flaw size; implementing a machining strategy using a series of diamond tools, wherein the diamond tools comprise embedded diamonds; wherein the machining strategy comprises rough, intermediate and fine machining steps; wherein each step comprises a tool path and machining parameters, wherein the tool path and machining parameters are carried out by at least one of the series of diamond tools; wherein the grain size of the embedded diamonds is larger than approximately the estimated maximal size of the surface critical flaw and smaller than approximately the estimated maximal size of the volume critical flaw.