Lithium-Sulfur Electrode Structure and Current Collector

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lithium-sulfur batteries face limitations due to the insulating nature of sulfur, solubility issues leading to corrosion and self-discharge, and the degradation of performance caused by soluble polysulfide intermediates, resulting in low practical capacity and cycling resistance.

Innovation Solution

A method for preparing a structure that acts as both the positive electrode and current collector for lithium-sulfur batteries, involving the deposition of liquid compositions on a removable substrate, followed by drying and separation, allowing for adjustment of morphology and rigidity, and using inorganic carbonaceous additives and polymeric binders to enhance electronic conductivity and mechanical strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If sulfur is used as active material in positive electrode, then theoretical specific capacity is significantly improved (up to 1675 mAh/g), but insulating nature of sulfur causes practical capacity to remain low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheoretical specific capacityVSAvoidpractical capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by combining sulfur with conductive carbon materials (graphene, carbon nanotubes, or carbon black) to create a conductive network within the electrode. This composite structure allows sulfur to maintain its high theoretical capacity while the carbon matrix provides electrical conductivity pathways, resolving the contradiction between high theoretical capacity and low practical capacity caused by sulfur's insulating nature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Use of energy by moving object

If sulfur is used as active material, then mass energy density is improved (300-600 Wh/g), but solubility of sulfur and polysulfides leads to corrosion and self-discharge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass energy densityVSAvoidcorrosion and self-discharge
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts or removes soluble sulfur and polysulfides from the electrode structure by using an inert matrix material that prevents their dissolution into the electrolyte. The insoluble inert matrix confines the sulfur-containing species within the electrode, preventing them from leaching out and causing corrosion or self-discharge, thus maintaining high mass energy density while eliminating harmful solubility effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an inert matrix material as an intermediary between sulfur and the electrolyte. This matrix acts as a barrier that prevents direct contact between soluble polysulfides and the electrolyte, thereby blocking the corrosion and self-discharge pathways while still allowing electrical conductivity and ion transport, thus preserving high energy density without the harmful solubility effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If soluble polysulfide intermediates are present during discharge, then electrochemical reaction proceeds, but performance degradation occurs due to shuttle mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrochemical reaction rateVSAvoidcycling resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes or extracts the soluble polysulfide intermediates from the electrolyte environment by confining them within the insoluble inert matrix of the electrode. This prevents the polysulfides from participating in the shuttle mechanism that causes performance degradation, while still allowing the electrochemical reaction to proceed efficiently within the confined electrode structure, thus maintaining high productivity with improved cycling resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the practical capacity and cycling resistance of lithium-sulfur batteries by maintaining electrode structure integrity and optimizing the deposition of active material, leading to enhanced energy density and reduced self-discharge.

Implementation Method 1

depositing one or more liquid compositions comprising the constituent ingredients of this structure on a removable substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeposition: Deposition (physical)

Implementation Method 2

drying the deposited composition(s)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentEP3472882B1Process for manufacturing a structure acting as a positive electrode and as a current collector for a lithium-sulfur electrochemical accumulator
Publication Date: 2020.07.01 COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
  • EP3472882B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3472882B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for preparing a structure acting both as a positive electrode for a lithium-sulfur battery and as a current collector, comprising the following operations: - depositing one or more liquid compositions comprising the constituent ingredients of this structure on a removable substrate; - drying the one or more deposited compositions; - separating the removable substrate from the structure thus obtained, which forms the structure acting both as a positive electrode for a lithium-sulfur battery and as a current collector.