Lithographic Tool Fingerprint Correction via Minimal Parameter Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for characterizing and correcting process fingerprints in lithographic tools are inefficient, requiring a large number of measurements and failing to optimize noise reduction, leading to unwieldy correction processes and reduced spatial resolution.

Innovation Solution

A method involving measuring process data, fitting a process signature model, and using it to calculate corrections for the lithographic tool, which reduces the number of necessary measurements and improves noise reduction by using a minimal number of parameters to characterize deviations, enabling more accurate and efficient corrections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional fingerprint characterization methods are used to correct lithographic tool imperfections, then corrections can be applied to reduce overlay errors, but the process requires a large number of measurements and becomes unwieldy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverlay error correctionVSAvoidcorrection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential parameters needed to characterize the process fingerprint from the full set of possible measurements. By identifying and measuring only the critical parameters that actually influence overlay errors, the method reduces the measurement burden while maintaining correction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified model (fingerprint model) that copies only the essential characteristics of the lithographic tool's imperfections. This model uses minimal parameters to represent the complex tool behavior, enabling efficient corrections without requiring full characterization of all tool parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If traditional fingerprint characterization methods are used, then process corrections can be calculated, but noise reduction is not optimized and spatial resolution is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefingerprint correction accuracyVSAvoidspatial resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring the measurement approach to the specific characteristics of each tool and process combination. Instead of using a uniform measurement strategy, the method identifies the local essential parameters specific to each lithographic tool's fingerprint, optimizing measurement precision for that particular application while avoiding unnecessary measurements that would lose spatial information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter set used for fingerprint characterization from a comprehensive set to a minimal essential set. By selecting only the parameters that have the greatest impact on overlay errors and removing redundant parameters, the method improves signal-to-noise ratio and preserves spatial resolution while maintaining correction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If a large number of measurements are taken to characterize process fingerprints, then more complete tool imperfections can be captured, but the measurement process becomes time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefingerprint characterization accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential parameters from the full measurement space, measuring only what is necessary to characterize the process fingerprint accurately. This selective measurement approach captures the critical tool imperfections while eliminating redundant measurements, thereby improving measurement efficiency without sacrificing characterization reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing only the necessary measurements required for accurate fingerprint characterization rather than exhaustive measurements of all possible parameters. This partial measurement strategy is sufficient to capture the essential tool imperfections and enables efficient corrections without the time cost of complete characterization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for more accurate and less noisy fingerprint corrections with fewer measurements, improving fabrication performance and process control by reducing lot-to-lot and wafer-to-wafer variations, and enabling more meaningful key performance indicators.

Implementation Method 1

a scatterometer in which a beam of radiation is directed onto a target on the surface of the substrate and properties of the scattered or reflected beam are measured

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 2

properties of the scattered or reflected beam are measured

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUSRE49460E1Inspection method and apparatus and lithographic processing cell
Publication Date: 2023.03.14 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • USRE49460E1 patent drawing
  • USRE49460E1 patent drawing
  • USRE49460E1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of calculating process corrections for a lithographic tool, and associated apparatuses. The method comprises measuring process defect data on a substrate that has been previously exposed using the lithographic tool; fitting a process signature model to the measured process defect data, so as to obtain a model of the process signature for the lithographic tool; and using the process signature model to calculate the process corrections for the lithographic tool.