Lithographic Substrate Table Actuator Control for Positioning Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current lithographic apparatuses face challenges in maintaining accurate dynamic positioning of substrates during scanning exposures, leading to increased overlay and focus errors as feature sizes decrease and substrate sizes increase, making it difficult to manage compliant dynamics effectively.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a lithographic apparatus with a substrate table having compliant dynamics, equipped with over-determined actuators and sensors, utilizing a transformation matrix to generate controller output signals that do not excite or observe the compliant dynamics in at least one degree of freedom, thereby improving positioning accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If scanning mode is used to maximize exposable field size and throughput, then productivity is improved, but positioning accuracy deteriorates due to dynamic positioning errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexposable field size and throughputVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the substrate table actively controllable with multiple actuators that can dynamically adjust positioning during scanning. The table transitions from a static support to an active platform with compliant dynamics that can be controlled in real-time to maintain positioning accuracy while moving at high speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the mechanical parameters of the substrate table by introducing compliant dynamics through multiple actuators. The system modifies the stiffness and mass distribution parameters to create a controllable flexible structure that can maintain precision during dynamic scanning operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If substrate size is increased to accommodate more target portions, then productivity is improved, but positioning control difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of target portions per substrateVSAvoidpositioning control difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the positioning control into multiple independent actuator systems, each controlling specific degrees of freedom. This segmentation allows the large substrate table to be controlled through distributed actuation points rather than requiring monolithic control of the entire structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate table is designed with multi-functionality by incorporating multiple actuators that can perform different positioning functions simultaneously. The same table structure handles both large-scale substrate support and fine-positioning adjustments through its compliant dynamics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If over-determined actuators are used to improve positioning accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidactuator system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by using the compliant dynamics model to continuously adjust actuator commands based on desired positioning. The feedback mechanism uses the known dynamic characteristics to predict and correct positioning errors in real-time, reducing the need for excessive actuator complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Manufacturing precision

If compliant dynamics are managed to reduce overlay errors, then manufacturing precision is improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverlay error reductionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-characterizing the compliant dynamics of the substrate table before operation. The dynamic model is established in advance and used to generate compensating control signals, allowing the system to proactively counteract positioning errors rather than reacting to them after they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9715182B2Lithographic apparatus, substrate support system, device manufacturing method and control program
Publication Date: 2017.07.25 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US9715182B2 patent drawing
  • US9715182B2 patent drawing
  • US9715182B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lithographic apparatus includes a driven object having compliant dynamics; a plurality of actuators configured to act on the driven object, wherein the plurality of actuators are over-determined in an actuator degree of freedom; a control system including a transformation matrix configured to generate controller output signals for each of the plurality of actuators in response to a setpoint, wherein the transformation matrix is configured such that the controller output signals do not excite the compliant dynamics of the driven object in at least one degree of freedom.