Lithographic Process Optimization via Bandwidth Speckle Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current lithographic processes face challenges in achieving precise pattern reproduction with features smaller than the classical resolution limit, particularly due to speckle interference effects that lead to local dose variations and non-uniform exposure, affecting pattern fidelity and critical dimension uniformity.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to optimize the lithographic process by computing a multi-variable cost function that includes design variables and radiation bandwidth, adjusting these variables to satisfy a speckle characteristic within a specification while maintaining image contrast, involving the reconfiguration of the lithographic process to reduce speckle contrast through changes in radiation bandwidth and pulse duration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the radiation bandwidth is increased to reduce speckle contrast, then speckle interference is reduced, but image contrast deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeckle contrastVSAvoidimage contrast
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the radiation bandwidth as a controllable parameter. The system modifies the spectral width of the illumination source to optimize the trade-off between reducing speckle contrast and maintaining image contrast, treating bandwidth as a tunable parameter rather than a fixed property

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by making the radiation bandwidth adjustable and reconfigurable during operation. The illumination source can dynamically change its spectral characteristics based on process requirements, transitioning between narrowband and wideband modes to balance speckle reduction with image quality preservation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the bandwidth is increased to reduce speckle, then speckle contrast decreases, but pattern fidelity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeckle interferenceVSAvoidpattern fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses parameter changes by adjusting the radiation bandwidth to control speckle effects while preserving pattern fidelity. By optimizing the bandwidth parameter, the system reduces speckle-induced local dose variations without compromising the accuracy of pattern reproduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms to monitor and adjust the radiation bandwidth based on observed speckle characteristics and pattern quality metrics. The system uses cost function evaluation to provide feedback on the trade-off between speckle reduction and pattern fidelity, enabling iterative optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple design variables are optimized together, then overall process performance improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess optimizationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the multi-variable optimization problem into manageable components. The cost function is structured to evaluate different design variables (bandwidth, pulse duration, illumination parameters) in a systematic way, allowing the complex optimization to be broken down into smaller computational tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces speckle contrast and improves image quality by maintaining image contrast within desired ranges, enhancing critical dimension uniformity and pattern fidelity, even with features below the classical resolution limit.

Implementation Method 1

a radiation source configured to generate radiation having a wavelength of 193 nanometers (nm)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

speckle interference effects that lead to local dose variations and non-uniform exposure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS20240045341A1Optimization of lithographic process based on bandwidth and speckle
Publication Date: 2024.02.08 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US20240045341A1 patent drawing
  • US20240045341A1 patent drawing
  • US20240045341A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for improving a lithographic process of imaging a portion of a design layout onto a substrate using a lithographic apparatus. The method includes computing a multi-variable cost function that is a function of: (i) a plurality of design variables that affect characteristics of the lithographic process and (ii) a radiation bandwidth of a radiation source of the lithographic apparatus; and reconfiguring one or more of the characteristics (e.g., EPE, image contrast, resist, etc.) of the lithographic process by adjusting one or more of the design variables (e.g., source, mask layout, bandwidth, etc.) until a termination condition is satisfied. The termination condition includes a speckle characteristic (e.g., a speckle contrast) maintained within a speckle specification associated with the radiation source and also maintaining an image contrast associated with the lithographic process within a desired range. The speckle characteristic being a function of the radiation bandwidth.