Lithography Diagnostic Apparatus for Overlay Error Root Cause Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In lithographic manufacturing processes, defects such as contamination and curvature on substrates and patterning devices lead to performance issues like overlay errors and critical dimension deviations, which are difficult to detect and trace back to their root cause, resulting in costly and disruptive maintenance operations.

Innovation Solution

A diagnostic apparatus that processes measurement data to identify correlations between local deviations on substrates and defects, generating diagnostic information to quickly identify the source of issues, thereby optimizing maintenance operations and reducing downtime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If maintenance operations are performed frequently to detect and eliminate defects, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to costly and disruptive maintenance interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary diagnostic measurements during normal operation to detect defects before they cause failures. By measuring local deviations and correlating them with defect distributions proactively, the system enables scheduled maintenance during planned downtime rather than forced interruptions, thus maintaining productivity while improving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors substrate local deviations and defect distributions, providing real-time feedback about contamination sources. This feedback loop enables predictive maintenance scheduling based on actual defect accumulation patterns rather than fixed intervals, optimizing the balance between reliability and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If diagnostic measurements are performed with high precision to identify defect sources, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect localization accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the existing lithographic apparatus's measurement capabilities (such as focus and overlay measurements) for dual purposes: both for process control and for diagnostic defect detection. By making the measurement system multi-functional, high-precision defect localization is achieved without adding complex dedicated diagnostic equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a data processing apparatus that acts as an intermediary, correlating routine measurement data with defect distribution data to extract diagnostic information. This intermediary layer enables high-precision defect source identification without requiring direct complex measurement hardware at the substrate level

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10613445B2Methods and apparatus for obtaining diagnostic information relating to a lithographic manufacturing process
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US10613445B2 patent drawing
  • US10613445B2 patent drawing
  • US10613445B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A diagnostic apparatus monitors a lithographic manufacturing system. First measurement data representing local deviations of some characteristic across a substrate is obtained using sensors within a lithographic apparatus, and/or a separate metrology tool. Other inspection tools perform substrate backside inspection to produce second measurement data. A high-resolution backside defect image is processed into a form in which it can be compared with lower resolution information from the first measurement data. Cross-correlation is performed to identify which of the observed defects are correlated spatially with the deviations represented in the first measurement data. A correlation map is used to identify potentially relevant clusters of defects in the more detailed original defect map. The responsible apparatus can be identified by pattern recognition as part of an automated root cause analysis. Alternatively, reticle inspection data may be used as second measurement data.