Lithography Failure Causality Modeling via Transfer Entropy Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current predictive maintenance methods for lithographic systems are inefficient due to the need for domain expertise, high false positive rates, and the inability to accurately trace causal relationships between events, leading to suboptimal alert validation and prolonged lead times in identifying root causes.

Innovation Solution

The method employs transfer entropy to determine causal relationships between parameter excursion events and failure events, constructing a process network to identify directed cycles and root causes, thereby improving predictive modeling and reducing diagnostic time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional predictive maintenance methods are used, then domain expertise is required and false positive rates are high, but diagnostic accuracy is reduced and lead time is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidlead time for identifying root causes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces transfer entropy as an intermediary computational method that objectively quantifies causal relationships between system parameters. This mediator replaces subjective domain expertise with a mathematical framework that automatically identifies root causes by measuring information flow between events, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy while reducing the time required for analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/expert-based diagnostic system with an information-theoretic system using transfer entropy calculations. This substitution transforms the diagnostic process from relying on human expertise and manual analysis to an automated computational approach that processes parameter data and identifies causal relationships objectively and rapidly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If traditional event analysis methods are used, then causal relationships between events cannot be accurately traced, but system understanding is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecausal relationship informationVSAvoidcomplexity of causal analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where transfer entropy calculations continuously evaluate the causal relationships between system events. By computing the information flow from one event to another and using this feedback to refine the causal model, the system accurately traces cause-and-effect relationships while maintaining a manageable analytical framework through iterative refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11461675B2Methods of modelling systems or performing predictive maintenance of systems, such as lithographic systems and associated lithographic systems
Publication Date: 2022.10.04 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US11461675B2 patent drawing
  • US11461675B2 patent drawing
  • US11461675B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a causal relationship between events in a plurality of parameter time series, the method including: identifying a first event associated with a parameter excursion event; identifying a second event associated with a failure event, wherein there are a plurality of events including the first events and second events; determining values of transfer entropy for pairs of the events to establish a causal relationship for each of the pairs of events; using the determined values of transfer entropy and identified causal relationships to determine a process network, wherein each of the events is a node in the process network, the edges between nodes being dependent upon the values of transfer entropy; identifying a directed cycle within the plurality of events and the causal relationships; classifying a directed cycle; and classifying one or more events having a causal relation to the classified directed cycle.