Lithography Mask Marking Volume Reduction via Particle Beam Etching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the semiconductor industry, as lithography objects with increasingly smaller structure dimensions and complex materials are developed, the removal of markings used for particle beam processing can lead to optical errors and material damage due to over-etching, which is time-consuming and costly, and complete removal is not always feasible or optimal.

Innovation Solution

A method using a particle beam and etching gas to reduce the volume of markings on lithography objects without complete removal, allowing the markings to remain on the object, thereby minimizing exposure to etching components and avoiding material damage, while maintaining optical specifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If complete removal of markings is performed to avoid optical errors, then optical quality is improved, but processing time increases and material damage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by reducing the marking volume to a target level rather than complete removal. The etching process stops when the marking volume reaches a predetermined target volume that is sufficient to avoid optical errors during lithography while minimizing processing time and material damage risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter from complete removal (100% volume reduction) to partial reduction (to a specific target volume). This parameter change optimizes the balance between optical quality and processing efficiency by identifying that complete removal is not necessary for avoiding optical errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If complete removal of markings is performed to avoid optical errors, then optical quality is improved, but material damage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical qualityVSAvoidmaterial damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing partial etching to reduce marking volume to a target level rather than complete removal. This prevents over-etching that could damage the lithography object while still achieving sufficient volume reduction to avoid optical errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses preliminary anti-action by setting a target volume threshold before material damage can occur. The etching process is controlled to stop at this predetermined volume, preventing the harmful effect of over-etching on the lithography object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Manufacturing precision

If complete removal of markings is performed, then optical errors are avoided, but etching gas consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical qualityVSAvoidetching gas consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by reducing marking volume to a target level rather than complete removal. This significantly reduces etching gas consumption while still achieving the necessary volume reduction to avoid optical errors during lithography.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Loss of time

If marking volume is reduced to a target level, then processing time is reduced, but some marking material remains on the object

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidremaining marking material
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing etching only to the extent necessary to reach the target volume, avoiding unnecessary additional etching that would increase processing time without providing additional benefit for avoiding optical errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter from complete removal (zero remaining material) to partial reduction (to a specific target volume). This parameter optimization shows that complete removal is not necessary for avoiding optical errors, and partial reduction suffices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces processing time, minimizes the risk of material damage, and conserves etching gas, offering a more efficient and cost-effective solution for complex lithography objects by reducing the marking volume to a level where it no longer interferes with optical properties during lithography.

Implementation Method 1

using a particle beam and an etching gas to process a marking in order to reduce the volume of the marking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEtching: Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS20240411223A1Method for processing DC marks for repairing lithography masks
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
  • US20240411223A1 patent drawing
  • US20240411223A1 patent drawing
  • US20240411223A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a method for processing a lithography object. The method comprises using a particle beam and an etching gas to process a marking in order to reduce the volume of the marking, the marking having been deposited on the object and remaining on the object. The invention also relates to a corresponding computer program and a corresponding device.