Lithography Model Training for Mask Bias Variation Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lithography models based on deep learning lack reliability in predicting mask bias variations, leading to inefficiencies in learning time and accuracy due to the need to input and process extensive data for various process variations.

Innovation Solution

A lithography model generating method that utilizes deep convolutional generative adversarial networks (DCGAN) to combine basic image data with transform image data generated through data augmentation, reflecting mask bias variations, and dynamically adjusts weights for each iteration to minimize learning time while ensuring accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If extensive data for various process variations is input and processed in existing lithography models, then the model can cover more process conditions, but the learning time increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of process conditionsVSAvoidlearning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies data augmentation techniques to pre-generate transform image data that represents various process variations (such as focus, dose, and mask bias variations) before actual model training. By pre-processing and synthesizing diverse training data through geometric transformations and parameter modifications, the system prepares comprehensive process condition coverage in advance, reducing the need to collect and process extensive experimental data during the learning phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates transformed copies of basic image data through data augmentation methods, generating synthetic training samples that represent different process variations. These copied and transformed images (with modified focus, dose, or mask bias parameters) serve as additional training data without requiring physical experimentation for each condition, thus expanding process coverage while maintaining efficient learning time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If existing lithography models use traditional deep learning approaches, then the model structure is simpler, but the accuracy in predicting mask bias variations is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracy of mask bias variationsVSAvoidmodel structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic weighting mechanism that adjusts the importance of different training samples during the learning process. The system dynamically modifies weights based on the specific process variations present in each training iteration, allowing the model to adaptively focus on critical mask bias variation patterns. This dynamic adjustment enhances prediction accuracy for mask bias variations without requiring a fundamentally more complex model architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies training parameters by applying data transformations that specifically target mask bias variation characteristics. Through parameter modifications such as focus variation, dose variation, and mask bias variation in the training data, the model learns to predict these variations more accurately. The approach changes the training parameters and data characteristics rather than fundamentally redesigning the model structure, achieving improved accuracy with controlled complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If transform image data indicating mask bias variation is generated through data augmentation, then the model learns process variations more effectively, but the data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel reliability for process variation predictionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data augmentation process into distinct, modular transformation operations. Each transformation (focus variation, dose variation, mask bias variation) is implemented as a separate processing step that can be independently applied and controlled. This segmentation allows the system to generate transform image data systematically, improving model reliability for process variation prediction while keeping the processing complexity manageable through organized, step-by-step data transformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12572129B2Lithography model generating method based on deep learning, and mask manufacturing method including the lithography model generating method
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12572129B2 patent drawing
  • US12572129B2 patent drawing
  • US12572129B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A reliable lithography model generating method reflecting a mask bias variation and a mask manufacturing method including the lithography model generating method are provided. The lithography model generating method includes preparing basic image data for learning, preparing transform image data that indicates a mask bias variation, generating a lithography model by performing deep learning by combining the basic image data and the transform image data, and verifying the lithography model.