Lithography Model Transfer Function for Resist Thickness Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current photolithography process models, whether physical or black box, face challenges in accurately predicting resist exposure and development due to complexity and computational intensity, with existing models either lacking accuracy or requiring extensive resources, and failing to effectively account for various process parameters.

Innovation Solution

A lithography model that uses a transfer function to relate exposure energy dose to remaining resist thickness, incorporating process variables such as aerial image intensity, acid diffusion, and bake conditions, allowing for more accurate simulation while reducing computational requirements by being based on physical processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If physical models are used to simulate photolithography processes, then interpolation and extrapolation accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpolation and extrapolation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The photolithography process model is segmented into distinct physical stages: optical proximity effect calculation, acid diffusion simulation, and resist development modeling. Each stage is handled by specialized sub-models that can be independently optimized and computed, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical/physical simulation systems with mathematically equivalent but computationally more efficient formulations. Specifically, partial differential equations describing acid diffusion are transformed into analytically solvable forms or simplified numerical schemes that preserve physical accuracy while reducing computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If black box models are used to accommodate various process parameters, then adaptability is improved, but interpolation and extrapolation accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of process parametersVSAvoidinterpolation and extrapolation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The model incorporates multiple process parameters (exposure dose, focus offset, resist thickness, bake conditions) as explicit variables that can be adjusted independently. By formulating the model with these parameters as controllable inputs rather than fixed constants, the system achieves adaptability while maintaining physical-based accuracy for interpolation and extrapolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent develops a universal photolithography model framework that can handle multiple process conditions and parameter variations within a single unified formulation. This multi-functional model accommodates different resist types, exposure wavelengths, and process conditions without requiring separate black-box models for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If variable threshold models are used to account for process parameter variations, then adaptability is improved, but computational intensity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccounting for process parameter variationsVSAvoidcomputational intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The model pre-calculates and stores lookup tables for acid diffusion profiles and resist development characteristics under various conditions. During actual simulation, these pre-computed data structures are queried and combined with current process parameters, avoiding repeated intensive numerical computations while still accounting for parameter variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a variable threshold model that selectively applies full computational complexity only where process parameter variations significantly impact results. In regions where parameters have minimal effect, simplified calculations are used, reducing overall computational intensity while maintaining necessary accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The model provides accurate interpolation and extrapolation results, capable of simulating three-dimensional resist profiles, enhancing the prediction of resist exposure and development processes, and improving the manufacturability of IC designs with reduced computational burden.

Implementation Method 1

Photolithography is the process of transferring patterns of geometric shapes on a mask to a thin layer of photosensitive material (resist) covering the surface of a semiconductor wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerisation: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

The resist component includes, among others, acid diffusion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS8473271B2Fast photolithography process simulation to predict remaining resist thickness
Publication Date: 2013.06.25 SYNOPSYS INC
  • US8473271B2 patent drawing
  • US8473271B2 patent drawing
  • US8473271B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lithography model uses a transfer function to map exposure energy dose to the thickness of remaining photoresist after development; while allowing the flexibility to account for other physical processes. In one approach, the model is generated by fitting empirical data. The model may be used in conjunction with an aerial image to obtain a three-dimensional profile of the remaining photoresist thickness after the development process. The lithography model is generally compact, yet capable of taking into account various physical processes associated with the photoresist exposure and/or development process for more accurate simulation.