Lithography Overlay Correction Using Pre-Exposure Substrate Grouping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current lithographic processes face challenges in accurately measuring and correcting for overlay and alignment errors, particularly in high-volume manufacturing, where performing full overlay measurements on each substrate is time-consuming and affects throughput.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine process corrections for lithographic processes by assigning substrates to groups based on pre-exposure parameter data and applying corrections using post-exposure metrology data, enabling dynamic updating of groups and corrections for improved run-to-run control strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If full overlay measurements are performed on each substrate, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverlay measurement accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments substrates into different groups based on pre-exposure parameter data characteristics. Instead of treating each substrate individually for measurements, substrates with similar characteristics are grouped together, allowing representative measurements to be applied to multiple substrates simultaneously, thus improving throughput while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary classification of substrates into groups based on pre-exposure parameter data before actual overlay measurements are taken. This preliminary action allows the system to predict which substrates will require measurements and which can use group-averaged corrections, reducing the total number of measurements needed and improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If group-based corrections are applied, then productivity is improved by reducing measurement time, but measurement precision deteriorates due to averaging effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing throughputVSAvoidcorrection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing different correction approaches for different substrate groups. Substrates in groups with high variability receive individual or representative measurements, while substrates in groups with low variability use group-averaged corrections. This ensures that measurement precision is maintained where needed while productivity is improved where possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the correction strategy based on parameters such as group variability, substrate characteristics, and process conditions. By changing parameters like the threshold for group assignment and the criteria for selecting representative substrates, the system optimizes the balance between productivity and measurement precision for different manufacturing scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If extensive historical tracking is implemented, then measurement precision is improved through better data analysis, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracyVSAvoiddata tracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential pre-exposure parameter data that is most relevant for substrate classification and correction, rather than tracking all possible historical parameters. This extraction of critical data elements reduces the complexity of the data tracking system while maintaining sufficient measurement precision for effective overlay correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Measurement precision

If offline measurements are performed, then measurement precision is improved through comprehensive analysis, but productivity deteriorates due to processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverlay measurement accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary classification and grouping of substrates using pre-exposure parameter data available before the lithographic exposure process. This preliminary action enables the system to prepare correction strategies in advance, allowing measurements and corrections to be applied during or immediately after exposure rather than requiring extensive offline analysis, thus maintaining both precision and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11782349B2Methods of determining corrections for a patterning process, device manufacturing method, control system for a lithographic apparatus and lithographic apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US11782349B2 patent drawing
  • US11782349B2 patent drawing
  • US11782349B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of determining a correction for a process parameter related to a lithographic process, wherein the lithographic process includes a plurality of runs during each one of which a pattern is applied to one or more substrates. The method of determining includes obtaining pre-exposure metrology data describing a property of a substrate; obtaining post-exposure metrology data comprising one or more measurements of the process parameter having been performed on one or more previously exposed substrates; assigning, based on the pre-exposure metrology data, a group membership status from one or more groups to the substrate; and determining the correction for the process parameter based on the group membership status and the post-exposure metrology data.