3D Lithography Resist Simulation via Radiation Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current lithographic processes face challenges in accurately reproducing small feature sizes and high feature densities due to optical proximity effects, which are difficult to predict and correct, especially when features are smaller than the wavelength of light used, leading to non-linear pattern transfer and potential manufacturing defects.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to simulate the three-dimensional spatial intensity distribution of radiation in the resist layer by calculating the incoherent sum and interference of forward and backward propagating radiation, allowing for a more accurate prediction of resist images and compensation for scattering effects, which are critical for improving image fidelity and pattern transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional two-dimensional resist models are used, then computational simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inability to account for three-dimensional standing wave effects and scattering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern transfer accuracyVSAvoidsimulation model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from conventional two-dimensional resist models to a three-dimensional simulation model that accounts for standing wave effects and scattering in the vertical dimension. This dimensional expansion enables accurate prediction of resist profile morphology by considering radiation intensity distribution throughout the depth of the resist layer, not just at the surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an interference factor as an intermediary parameter that quantifies the combined effect of forward and backward propagating radiation. This factor serves as a mediator between the complex electromagnetic interactions and the resist exposure model, enabling practical computation while capturing three-dimensional effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If features are made smaller than the wavelength of light, then feature density increases, but optical proximity effects become non-linear and difficult to predict

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature densityVSAvoidpattern reproduction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates scattering effects and standing wave formation as feedback mechanisms that continuously influence the radiation intensity distribution within the resist layer. By accounting for backward-propagating radiation that reflects off the substrate and interferes with forward-propagating radiation, the model captures the non-linear optical proximity effects that occur at high feature densities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If three-dimensional radiation distribution is calculated including interference, then image fidelity improves, but computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial intensity distribution accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the complex three-dimensional electromagnetic problem into a more computationally tractable form by changing parameters: it uses an interference factor that depends on depth into the resist layer, and calculates an incoherent sum of forward and backward propagating radiation. These parameter transformations maintain accuracy while reducing computational burden compared to full-wave electromagnetic simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more precise control over the lithographic process, enhancing the reproduction of small features and reducing manufacturing defects by accounting for three-dimensional effects within the resist layer, thus improving the overall fidelity and accuracy of pattern transfer.

Implementation Method 1

calculating an interference of the forward propagating radiation in the resist layer and the backward propagating radiation in the resist layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Implementation Method 2

compensation for scattering effects, which are critical for improving image fidelity and pattern transfer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS9235662B2Lithography model for 3D resist profile simulations
Publication Date: 2016.01.12 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US9235662B2 patent drawing
  • US9235662B2 patent drawing
  • US9235662B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein is a method for simulating a three-dimensional spatial intensity distribution of radiation formed within a resist layer on a substrate resulting from an incident radiation, the method comprising: calculating an incoherent sum of forward propagating radiation in the resist layer and backward propagating radiation in the resist layer; calculating an interference of the forward propagating radiation in the resist layer and the backward propagating radiation in the resist layer; and calculating the three-dimensional spatial intensity distribution of radiation from the incoherent sum and the interference.