Live Deep Learning Model for Interactive Qualitative-Quantitative Labeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional deep learning algorithms require extensive and labor-intensive manual labeling of training datasets, which is time-consuming and prone to errors, leading to frustration in generating suitably trained models, especially in complex applications where low-quality labeling can result in multiple iterations of labeling, training, and evaluation.

Innovation Solution

The method of interactive qualitative-quantitative live labeling uses a live deep learning model to generate predictions, convert them into provisional labels, and iteratively refine them until they match the actual labels, reducing the time required for qualitative labeling and improving the model's predictive ability over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual labeling of training datasets is performed extensively, then labeling quality can be improved, but time consumption and labor intensity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling qualityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

A live deep learning model serves as an intermediary tool during the qualitative labeling process. The model generates provisional labels that guide human annotators, reducing the time and effort required to achieve high-quality labeling while maintaining accuracy through iterative refinement between model predictions and human verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual labeling is performed extensively to ensure quality, then labeling accuracy improves, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements iterative feedback loops where the live model generates predictions, human annotators verify and correct them, and the model is retrained with the improved labels. This feedback mechanism automates quality control and reduces the need for complex manual processes while maintaining high labeling accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The live deep learning model performs self-updating through automated retraining on verified labels. The system serves itself by automatically improving its own predictive capabilities without requiring external intervention for model maintenance, reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If conventional manual labeling is used, then labeling completeness can be achieved, but productivity decreases due to labor-intensive processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling completenessVSAvoidlabeling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The live model performs preliminary labeling before human verification. By pre-generating provisional labels for all training instances, the system ensures complete coverage of the dataset while reducing the subsequent manual work required, thereby maintaining completeness while dramatically improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If extensive manual labeling and training iterations are performed, then model performance can be improved, but overall training time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The live model operates continuously throughout the labeling process, generating predictions and being retrained in real-time as new verified labels become available. This continuous improvement cycle eliminates idle time between labeling batches and accelerates model convergence while maintaining high performance through constant refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12124953B2Interactive qualitative-quantitative live labeling for deep learning artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 BLUWARE INC
  • US12124953B2 patent drawing
  • US12124953B2 patent drawing
  • US12124953B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A live model of a deep learning algorithm may be used to generate predictions of features of interest in an instance of training data. If the predictions correspond to actual features of interest, the predictions may be converted to qualitative labels, the instance may be designated as being acceptably labeled, and the live model may be trained on all instances of training data designated as acceptably labeled to update the live model. If the predictions do not correspond, a repetitive process of applying qualitative labels to features of interest in the instance of training data, quantitatively training on the qualitatively labeled instance of training data and all instances of training data designated as acceptably labeled, and generating predictions of features of interest until the predictions correspond to the actual features of interest.