Live Session Participant Selection Using Rule-Based Queues

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional conferencing systems lack the capability for dynamic and unbiased selection of participants for active engagement in a live video conference, often resulting in biased, non-random, or repetitive selection processes that disrupt the session.

Innovation Solution

A conferencing system that allows hosts to select participants using predefined rules, such as random or least-talkative first, with automated participant selection and highlighting, utilizing set theory operations on participant lists to create or modify lists in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual participant selection is used by the host, then the host can control the selection process, but the selection becomes biased, repetitive, and disruptive to the session

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehost controlVSAvoidselection fairness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables participants to automatically select themselves for active engagement through predefined rules (random selection, least-talkative first, most-talkative first) without requiring host intervention. The conferencing system autonomously manages participant selection, eliminating manual bias while maintaining control through rule-based automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the selection parameter from manual host discretion to automated rule-based criteria. By implementing different selection rules (random, least-talkative first, most-talkative first), the system dynamically adjusts selection parameters to achieve fairness and reduce disruption while maintaining operational control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If automated participant selection is implemented, then selection fairness and efficiency improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection fairnessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The host pre-configures selection rules and participant lists before the live session begins. The system stores these predefined rules (random, least-talkative first, most-talkative first) and participant lists in advance, so that during the live session, automated selection can occur without real-time complexity or manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments participant management by creating separate lists (e.g., all participants, muted participants, active speakers) that can be independently managed and combined using set theory operations. This segmentation simplifies the automated selection process by breaking down the participant pool into manageable, rule-applicable groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If real-time list modification is enabled during live session, then selection adaptability improves, but processing time and system load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelist flexibilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors participant activity (speaking status, mute state, engagement level) and uses this feedback to dynamically update participant lists and selection eligibility in real-time. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt selection criteria based on current session state without requiring manual reconfiguration or excessive processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12549398B1Server-based dynamic selection of participants in a live session
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 ZOOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • US12549398B1 patent drawing
  • US12549398B1 patent drawing
  • US12549398B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Dynamic selection of participants in video conference where a host of a live session can select a list of participants and a rule for selecting participants therefrom, causing video conferencing services to iteratively apply the rule to the list to select participants for active engagement in the live session. The host can select multiple lists to generate combined lists using set operators such as union, intersection, and difference. The host can modify parameters of parameterized rules. A console may be presented by a user interface of a client device of the host, where the host can select and combine lists, and select and modify rules. The console may present a queue of selected participants.