Liveness Detection via Reflective Region Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Face recognition systems are vulnerable to attacks using non-living tools such as images and videos, which can deceive identity verification processes, necessitating a method to differentiate between living and non-living entities.

Innovation Solution

A liveness detection apparatus and method that identifies a target object by detecting a reflective region corresponding to identification content in acquired image data, determining regional features, and recognizing whether the target object is a living body based on these features, using a processor to analyze pixel values and correlation coefficients.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If face recognition is performed using a camera in non-contact mode, then the recognition process can be completed efficiently, but the system becomes vulnerable to attacks using non-living tools such as images and videos

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecognition process efficiencyVSAvoidsecurity against spoofing attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing liveness detection before face recognition. The system first determines whether the detected face belongs to a living person using depth information and texture analysis, and only then proceeds to perform face recognition. This preliminary verification step prevents spoofing attacks while maintaining efficient recognition processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary liveness detection mechanism between image capture and face recognition. This intermediary step uses depth maps, texture analysis, and multiple verification criteria to authenticate that the subject is alive, thereby mediating between the efficient non-contact imaging and secure recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If liveness detection is performed to prevent spoofing attacks, then security is improved, but the detection complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against spoofing attacksVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the liveness detection process into distinct analytical components: depth map analysis, texture analysis, and verification criterion evaluation. Each component processes specific aspects of the facial data independently, then combines results to determine liveness. This segmentation manages complexity by breaking down the detection task into manageable, specialized sub-tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by utilizing depth information and texture characteristics as additional verification dimensions beyond standard 2D face recognition. By incorporating these additional parameters (depth values, texture metrics), the system enhances security without requiring fundamentally new detection hardware, managing complexity through parameter expansion rather than structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If traditional face recognition methods are used without liveness detection, then the system is simpler and faster, but it cannot distinguish between living and non-living entities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidability to distinguish living vs non-living
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains simplicity by performing liveness detection as a preliminary, automated step that occurs before face recognition. The system automatically evaluates depth and texture parameters to determine liveness, then proceeds with or without recognition based on this determination. This preliminary action adds minimal operational complexity while significantly improving measurement precision for distinguishing living versus non-living entities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively prevents attacks from non-living tools by accurately distinguishing between living and non-living entities, enhancing the security of face recognition systems.

Implementation Method 1

determining whether there is a reflective region corresponding to the identification content in the acquired image data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS9940532B2Liveness detection apparatus and liveness detection method
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 BEIJING KUANGSHI TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
  • US9940532B2 patent drawing
  • US9940532B2 patent drawing
  • US9940532B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liveness detection apparatus and a liveness detection method are provided. The liveness detection apparatus may comprise: a specific exhibiting device, for exhibiting a specific identification content; an image acquiring device, for acquiring image data of a target object to be recognized during the exhibition of the identification content; a processor, for determining whether there is a reflective region corresponding to the identification content in the acquired image data, determining a regional feature of the reflective region when there is the reflective region, to obtain a determination result, and recognizing whether the target object is a living body based on the determination result.