Liver Perfusion Phase Classification via Plausibility Check

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for classifying medical image data of the liver based on perfusion phases are not robust or accurate enough, particularly in correctly assigning phases for diagnostic purposes, which is crucial for detecting and differentiating liver lesions.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the acquisition of medical image data sets within a short period, using a classification algorithm to correlate image data with defined perfusion phases, and a plausibility check to verify the classification based on metadata and logical order, ensuring accurate and robust phase assignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If current classification methods are used for medical image data, then the process is simple, but the accuracy and robustness of phase assignment is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase assignment accuracyVSAvoidclassification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The classification process is divided into distinct modules: a classification algorithm module that performs initial phase assignment, and a plausibility check module that verifies the results. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in specific tasks, improving overall accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The plausibility check module provides feedback on the initial classification results by verifying logical consistency of phase assignments across multiple image data sets. This feedback mechanism enables correction of erroneous classifications and ensures robust phase assignment, directly addressing the accuracy requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple image data sets are analyzed to improve classification reliability, then the diagnostic accuracy improves, but the processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of multiple image data sets using the classification algorithm before conducting the plausibility check. This preliminary action on multiple data sets allows the system to gather sufficient information for reliable phase assignment while enabling subsequent efficient verification through the plausibility check module.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes temporal parameters (time points of image acquisition) and contrast agent concentration parameters across multiple image data sets to perform classification. By analyzing parameter changes across the time series of images, the system achieves reliable phase determination while the plausibility check ensures consistency without requiring excessive processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240386550A1Classification of Dynamically Contrast-Enhanced Medical Image Data of a Liver
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US20240386550A1 patent drawing
  • US20240386550A1 patent drawing
  • US20240386550A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for classifying medical image data using a classification algorithm configured to make an image-based correlation between an image data set and a phase of a plurality of defined phases relative to a time of administration of a contrast agent with additional plausibility checking. The image data may include at least three image data sets in each case imaging the examination region in each case at a time of capture within a period of less than two hours.