Lizard Trap with Evaporative Cooling and Open-Top Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing animal trapping devices are ineffective for capturing lizards like iguanas due to their hesitation to enter enclosed structures and lack of a thermally inviting environment, leading to failure in trapping and disposal.

Innovation Solution

A novel animal trapping device featuring a base with a wire mesh cage assembly and evaporative cooling reservoirs that create a temperature gradient, attracting lizards through conical entrances and preventing escape, with a liquid feeding system to maintain a desirable environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional enclosed traps are used, then animal containment is achieved, but lizards hesitate to enter due to enclosed structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping effectivenessVSAvoidanimal entry willingness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional trap design by providing an open-top structure instead of an enclosed cage, allowing lizards to enter freely while preventing escape through one-way exit mechanisms and angled surfaces that guide them into the collection chamber

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The trap is segmented into distinct functional zones: an entry area with open top for attraction, a transition zone with angled surfaces, and a collection chamber with escape prevention mechanisms, allowing each section to address specific behavioral needs of lizards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If ambient temperature is high, then lizards are active and visible, but the trap environment becomes thermally uncomfortable for lizards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping efficiencyVSAvoidinternal trap temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a shaded microenvironment within the open-top structure, using the trap walls and positioning to block direct sunlight from the collection chamber while maintaining visibility and accessibility at the entry point

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If trap structure is simplified, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but animal removal and disposal becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidanimal removal ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the animal removal function as a separate operational step, designing the collection chamber to allow easy access and removal of captured lizards through the open top structure, eliminating the need for complex mechanical release mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively and efficiently traps lizards by creating a thermally inviting environment, preventing escape, and providing a safe and easy means for capture and disposal.

Implementation Method 1

evaporative cooling reservoirs that create a temperature gradient

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporative cooling: Evaporative Cooler

Data Source

PatentUS11503821B2Animal trapping device
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 BROSKEY ALEX JOHN
  • US11503821B2 patent drawing
  • US11503821B2 patent drawing
  • US11503821B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An animal trapping device with a base length separating first and second ends of the base, a wire mesh cage assembly operably configured to surround the base and defining a base opening and a width, wherein the base is selectively, freely, and removably disposed within the base opening. The device also includes one or two opposing mesh entrances with a second free end elevated above an upper surface of the base and defining an exit aperture. The first and second wire mesh entrances, the wire mesh cage assembly, and the upper surface of the base defining an animal retention zone and the exit apertures of the first and second wire mesh entrances facing one another and at least partially aligned with one another.