LLM Adapter Merging to Avoid Repeated Neural Network Retraining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing neural networks, such as Large Language Models (LLMs), require costly computational resources and time for constant retraining to adapt to specific tasks or domains, and existing adapter module merging approaches fail to account for spectral and magnitude characteristics, leading to feature interference and redundant retraining.

Innovation Solution

A merging framework that selectively merges pretrained model parameters of an LLM with retrained adapter weights by pruning redundant features and measuring similarity metrics to integrate only task-specific components, reducing computational cost and enhancing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If neural networks are constantly retrained to adapt to specific tasks or domains, then the model's adaptability and task performance are improved, but the computational cost, time, and resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask adaptation capabilityVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the neural network into a base model and separate adapter modules. Each adapter module is trained independently for specific tasks or domains, allowing the base model to remain frozen and avoiding the need to retrain the entire network. This segmentation enables efficient task adaptation with minimal computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal base model that can serve multiple tasks by combining it with different adapter modules. The same base model can be paired with various task-specific adapters to perform different functions, eliminating the need to train separate models for each task and reducing overall computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If adapter modules are merged without considering spectral and magnitude characteristics, then the merging process is simpler and faster, but feature interference occurs and retraining becomes necessary

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemerging speedVSAvoidfeature compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism that evaluates the compatibility between adapter modules and base models by analyzing spectral and magnitude characteristics. This feedback guides the merging process, ensuring that only compatible adapters are merged with the base model, thereby preventing feature interference and eliminating the need for subsequent retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If the entire neural network is retrained for each specific task, then the model achieves optimal performance for that task, but the time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask performance accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary training of adapter modules independently before merging them with the base model. This preliminary action allows the adapters to learn task-specific features in advance, so that when merged, they immediately provide the needed task performance without requiring additional retraining time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of energy

If adapter modules are trained independently for different tasks, then computational efficiency is improved, but feature interference and redundancy occur when merging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses spectral and magnitude analysis as a feedback mechanism to identify and resolve feature conflicts when merging independently trained adapter modules. This feedback ensures that only compatible features are integrated, maintaining model simplicity while preserving the computational efficiency benefits of independent adapter training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250384272A1Systems and methods for constructing neural networks
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 SALESFORCE INC
  • US20250384272A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384272A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384272A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments also provide an LLM adapter training and merging framework that builds a new neural network model by merging a first LLM (stronger) with an adapter that has been trained in conjunction with a second LLM (weaker). Specifically, the adapter may be trained in conjunction with a smaller LLM to perform a specific task or adapt to a particular domain. The trained adapter is then merged with a different (larger) LLM to produce a new model. In this way, developers may select compatible LLMs as base models to merge with trained adapters to produce new models without additional training and/or finetuning the adapter with different LLMs. The one-time domain specific adapter training may be applied to any subsequent developments in merging compatible models with the trained specific adapter, thus enhancing computational efficiency of neural network model adaptation.