LLM Chatbot Workflow Policies for Automated Ticket Triage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional customer support systems face inefficiencies due to the reliance on human agents for labeling and routing tickets, leading to resource-intensive training, long response delays, and limited categorization of issues, which frustrates customers and increases labor costs.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an AI-augmented customer support system that utilizes machine learning models for automatic ticket categorization, triage, and response generation, including a Solve Module for generating template answers, a Triage Module for routing, and an Assist Module for agent assistance, leveraging supervised learning and natural language understanding to enhance efficiency and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If human agents manually search and categorize tickets using institutional knowledge, then accurate ticket routing is achieved, but response time increases and labor costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveticket categorization accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary categorization and routing decisions using AI models before human agents intervene. The triage module automatically analyzes incoming tickets, determines appropriate categories, and routes them to the correct queues, eliminating the need for agents to manually search institutional knowledge for every ticket.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The ticketing system provides self-service capabilities through automated categorization and routing. The AI-powered triage module independently processes tickets without requiring human agent intervention for initial classification, allowing the system to serve itself in the categorization function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If human experts manually label and route tickets, then accurate routing decisions are made, but labor costs and resource intensity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting decision accuracyVSAvoidcost per ticket
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical process of human expert analysis with AI-based automated triage. Machine learning models analyze ticket content, customer history, and issue patterns to make routing decisions, substituting human cognitive labor with computational processes that are both accurate and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The triage module acts as an intermediary between ticket submission and human agent assignment. This intermediate AI layer processes tickets, determines appropriate routing, and only escalates complex cases to human experts, reducing the overall burden on human resources while maintaining routing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If a small number of ticket categories are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but customer frustration increases due to limited categorization options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecategorization system complexityVSAvoidcustomer frustration
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the categorization process into multiple hierarchical levels. Instead of using a single flat category structure, tickets are classified through layered categories (e.g., primary category, sub-category, specific issue type), allowing for fine-grained classification without increasing surface-level complexity for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The categorization system is dynamic and adaptive, automatically creating new categories or modifying existing ones based on emerging ticket patterns and customer feedback. This allows the system to handle diverse customer issues without requiring manual expansion of the category structure, maintaining simplicity while increasing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260017464A1System and Method for Autonomous Customer Support Chatbot Agent With Natural Language Workflow Policies
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 FORETHOUGHT TECH INC
  • US20260017464A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017464A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017464A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous customer support Chatbot Agent utilizes a large language model to aid in implementing a workflow to solve a customer issue. A natural language workflow policy may be selected by an admin, along with tools such as API calls. The large language model determines the implementation details for the workflow based on the workflow policy and the selected tools.