LLM Code Generation for Dynamic Error Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current natural language processing systems require manual programming and are limited in handling unexpected errors or environmental failures, as they need pre-defined logic to operate effectively, restricting their ability to learn and adapt like humans.

Innovation Solution

The system uses a knowledge graph and natural language processing to enable computers to learn and adapt by searching for and implementing necessary logic or data at runtime, allowing it to handle missing data, wrong data, or unexpected situations without crashing, and to teach itself new skills through user input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual programming is used to implement new functions, then system reliability is improved through pre-defined logic, but system adaptability deteriorates as the system cannot handle unexpected errors or environmental failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs large language models to automatically generate code and implement new functions without requiring manual programming. The LLM analyzes natural language descriptions and autonomously produces functional code, allowing the system to adapt to new tasks and handle unexpected situations dynamically while maintaining reliability through the intelligence of the LLM-generated solutions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static pre-defined logic to dynamic adaptive behavior by utilizing LLMs that can process natural language inputs and generate appropriate code responses in real-time. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt to changing requirements and unexpected errors while maintaining operational reliability through intelligent decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If pre-defined logic is used to operate the system, then system stability is improved, but system flexibility deteriorates as the system cannot learn and adapt like humans

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidsystem flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the LLM analyzes the outcomes of executed code and natural language interactions to continuously improve its code generation capabilities. This feedback loop allows the system to maintain stability through learned patterns while improving flexibility through adaptive learning from user interactions and execution results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The LLM enables the system to teach itself new skills by automatically generating code from natural language descriptions without requiring manual reprogramming. The system autonomously learns from user inputs and environmental feedback, maintaining stability through consistent operational patterns while gaining flexibility through self-acquired knowledge

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional programming languages are used, then manufacturing precision is improved through structured code, but ease of operation deteriorates as programmers need specialized knowledge and experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding precisionVSAvoidprogramming ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual code writing with an intelligent LLM-based system that translates natural language directly into functional code. This substitution eliminates the need for users to learn programming syntax and structure while maintaining coding precision through the LLM's ability to generate syntactically correct and logically sound code from natural language descriptions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The LLM serves as a universal translator between natural language and programming code, enabling users with any background to program the system. The single LLM interface handles diverse programming tasks across different languages and paradigms, maintaining precision through its trained understanding of multiple programming contexts while dramatically improving ease of operation by accepting natural language inputs from non-programmers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If low code/no code tools are used, then ease of operation is improved through visual interfaces, but device complexity increases due to the need for drag-drop consoles and workflow configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-programmer accessibilityVSAvoidtool complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and eliminates the complex drag-drop console and visual workflow configuration interfaces from the programming process. Instead, it directly uses natural language processing to generate code, removing the intermediate complex tools while maintaining ease of operation by allowing users to simply describe what they want in natural language

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than requiring users to assemble code through complex visual tools and workflows, the system inverts the process by having the LLM automatically generate the complete functional code directly from natural language descriptions. This eliminates the need for users to navigate complex tool interfaces while maintaining accessibility for non-programmers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS20240281600A1Method, System, and Computer Program Product for Code Generation Using LLMs
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 KOGNITOS INC
  • US20240281600A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281600A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281600A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is an approach to implement code generation for integration with a third-party application. Automated code generation is used to generate code to interact with a system that is provided by a separate company or organization from the system that has generated the code. A large language model may be used to generate the code.