LLM Continuity Error Repair for Context-Coherent Movie Scenes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Goof errors in films and television shows, such as anachronistic elements and inconsistencies, diminish artistic quality and can harm production reputation and viewership, with current solutions being inefficient and prone to human error.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a pre-trained large language model to generate textual representations of video scenes, identify inconsistencies, propose alternative text, and guide image replacement to correct continuity errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual inspection and correction of goof errors is used, then correction accuracy can be maintained, but production time and human labor increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection accuracyVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual human inspection with an automated computer vision system that uses deep learning models to detect and correct goof errors. The system automatically analyzes video frames, identifies inconsistencies with background information, and generates corrected versions without human intervention, thereby eliminating the time-consuming manual process while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-correction by automatically generating corrected video frames based on detected errors and background context. The deep learning model independently analyzes the video content, compares it with embedded background information, and produces corrected versions without requiring human editors to review or approve each correction, enabling the system to serve itself in the error correction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated correction systems are implemented, then productivity increases, but system complexity and computational resources requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the error correction process into distinct sequential stages: (1) extracting background information from video metadata, (2) generating captions for video frames, (3) comparing captions with background information to detect errors, (4) generating corrected frames using deep learning models, and (5) assembling corrected frames into the final video. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently and reduces overall system complexity by breaking down the complex correction task into manageable modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses intermediate representations such as text captions and background information embeddings as mediators between the video frames and the correction process. Instead of directly analyzing pixel data for errors, the system converts visual information into textual captions, compares these with background context, and uses the resulting insights to guide the deep learning model in generating corrections. This intermediary approach simplifies the comparison process and reduces computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If human editors manually correct goof errors, then contextual understanding is maintained, but labor costs and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontextual coherenceVSAvoidediting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops where the generated captions from video frames are continuously compared with the background information to identify inconsistencies. The deep learning model uses this feedback about contextual mismatches to generate corrected frames that align with the background setting. This feedback mechanism ensures that corrections maintain contextual coherence by continuously referencing the original background information throughout the correction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary extraction of background information from video metadata and generation of captions for all video frames before the actual correction process begins. By preparing these intermediate representations in advance, the system can quickly compare captions with background information and identify errors without requiring time-consuming real-time analysis during the correction phase, thereby maintaining contextual understanding while reducing overall editing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12580002B2Goof repair in movies based on large language models (LLMS)
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12580002B2 patent drawing
  • US12580002B2 patent drawing
  • US12580002B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatic detection and correction of continuity errors in video scenes. The method includes generating a textual representation of one or more visual scenes in a video using image caption technology and comparing the textual representation of the one or more visual scenes with embedded contextual information of the video. The method further includes identifying one or more inconsistency errors between the textual representation of one or more visual scenes and the embedded contextual information of the video. The method further includes proposing alternative text to reconcile the one or more inconsistency errors using a pre-trained large language model and employing the proposed alternative text to guide image replacement in the one or more visual scenes containing the one or more inconsistency errors.