LLM Document Image Pipeline for Reliable Key-Value Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning models struggle to accurately and consistently extract key/value pairs from images due to variations in text layout, alignment, font sizes, and image quality, which complicates the digitization and automation of workflows in documents.

Innovation Solution

A method involving large language models (LLMs) to assess image quality, classify document types, and extract key/value pairs using structured prompts, including image quality evaluation, classification, extraction, and confidence scoring to ensure accuracy and integrity of extracted data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If traditional machine learning models are used to extract key/value pairs from images, then the extraction process can be automated, but the accuracy and consistency deteriorate due to variations in text layout, alignment, font sizes, and image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of document processingVSAvoidextraction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The extraction process is divided into multiple independent stages: image quality assessment, document type classification, key/value pair extraction, and confidence scoring. Each stage is handled by specialized LLM prompts that focus on specific aspects, improving overall accuracy while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Large Language Models serve as an intermediary layer between the raw image data and the extraction logic. The LLMs process the image content through carefully designed prompts that guide the extraction of key/value pairs, bridging the gap between unstructured image data and structured output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple document formats with varying layouts are processed, then the system's versatility improves, but the extraction consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument format compatibilityVSAvoidextraction consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a universal LLM-based approach that can handle multiple document types (invoices, receipts, forms, etc.) through a single integrated framework. The same core extraction mechanism adapts to different document formats by adjusting prompts based on detected document type, maintaining consistency across diverse inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts extraction parameters and prompts based on the detected document type and image quality characteristics. By changing the parameters of the LLM prompts according to the specific document format, the system maintains extraction consistency across varying layouts and formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If image quality varies in the input data, then the system's adaptability improves, but the OCR accuracy and extracted data reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality toleranceVSAvoidextracted data reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs image quality assessment as a preliminary step before extraction. By evaluating image quality characteristics first and adjusting the extraction strategy accordingly, the system prepares appropriate processing approaches in advance, ensuring reliable extraction even from images with varying quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates confidence scoring that provides feedback on the quality and reliability of extracted key/value pairs. This feedback mechanism allows the system to identify low-confidence extractions that may result from poor image quality and flag them for review or re-processing, maintaining overall data reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260080708A1Multi-stage framework for extracting key/value pairs from images
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 THE MFGRS LIFE INSURANCE
  • US20260080708A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080708A1 patent drawing
  • US20260080708A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for processing document images using large language models to extract a key/value pair. The method includes a four-stage framework: (1) Image Quality Evaluation, assessing image attributes like text legibility and sharpness; (2) Image Classification, categorizing documents into predefined types; (3) Key/Value Pair Extraction, identifying relevant data fields; and (4) Extraction Evaluation, assigning confidence scores based on one or more predetermined criteria. The process employs prompt engineering to configure structured prompts for guiding the model at each stage. Outputs, including confidence scores and extracted data, are formatted for integration with downstream workflows, enabling applications in claims processing, invoicing, and other document-centric tasks.