LLM-Based Integration Flow Generation with Grounded Prompts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Developers face challenges in creating integration flows due to the complexity of runtime environments and development languages, leading to inefficient and time-intensive development processes, especially when using automated code builders.

Innovation Solution

Employing large language models (LLMs) to generate integration flows by providing prompts that include grounding information, allowing for accurate and compatible code generation, followed by validation and execution in a runtime environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated code builders are used to create integration flows, then development efficiency is improved, but the complexity of runtime environments and development languages increases the difficulty of use and time intensity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment efficiencyVSAvoidease of use
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a natural language processing intermediary layer between the user and the complex integration flow development environment. Users interact through simple text descriptions rather than directly manipulating complex technical interfaces, translating natural language requirements into technical integration configurations automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical interaction with complex development interfaces by using AI-based natural language processing systems. Instead of requiring users to manually configure integration flows through technical interfaces, the system automatically generates configurations from text descriptions, substituting mechanical operations with intelligent automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If traditional methods are used to create integration flows, then accuracy and compatibility are maintained, but development time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring validation rules, compatibility checks, and integration templates before the actual integration flow creation. The system prepares the necessary technical framework and constraints in advance, allowing rapid generation of accurate integration flows without sacrificing reliability during the development process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous feedback mechanisms where the system automatically validates generated integration flows against predefined rules, checks compatibility with target systems, and provides real-time corrections. This feedback loop ensures accuracy and reliability while maintaining rapid development speed through automated validation rather than manual verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12461955B2Integration flow generation using large language models
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 SALESFORCE INC
  • US12461955B2 patent drawing
  • US12461955B2 patent drawing
  • US12461955B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, apparatuses, and computer program products are described. A system may receive, via a cloud-based platform, user input comprising a request for generation of the integration flow. The system may generate a query based on the request and a query template including one or more example integration flows and a request to generate a natural language description of the integration flow. The system may transmit the query to the LLM and may receive, from the LLM, a response including the integration flow and the natural language description. The system may extract the integration flow and the natural language description from the response. The system may perform a validation process on the integration flow based at least in part on one or more integration flow validation rules.