LLM Media Editing Architecture for Easier Tool Navigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing media content editing software is complex and difficult for typical users to navigate, leading to underutilization of its powerful editing capabilities due to unexplored features and lack of knowledge about available tools.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a media content editing architecture that utilizes machine learning techniques, including a large language model (LLM) and a prompt manager, to interpret user input and perform edits through a dialog-assisted interface, with a system evolving process that refines the architecture based on user feedback and viewer engagement metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional media editing software with comprehensive editing tools is provided, then editing capabilities and functionality are improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveediting capabilitiesVSAvoidsoftware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a dialog-assisted interface with natural language processing as an intermediary layer between the user and the complex editing tools. This mediator translates simple user commands into appropriate editing operations, allowing users to access powerful editing capabilities without needing to understand or navigate the underlying software complexity. The system acts as a bridge that converts natural language requests into tool-specific parameters and actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs machine learning models that automatically interpret user intent and select appropriate editing tools and parameters without requiring manual configuration. The AI-driven interface self-adapts to user preferences and editing patterns, providing personalized editing suggestions and automatically adjusting tool settings based on the media content being edited, thereby reducing the operational burden on users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive editing tools are provided, then editing capabilities are improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to difficulty in navigating and utilizing features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveediting capabilitiesVSAvoidease of use
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The dialog-assisted interface serves as an intermediary that translates natural language commands into editing operations. Users can describe desired edits in everyday language, and the system's natural language processing component interprets these commands, maps them to appropriate editing tools, and executes the desired operations, thereby making comprehensive editing capabilities accessible to users without technical expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical interaction methods (menu navigation, tool selection, parameter adjustment) with an AI-driven natural language processing system. Instead of requiring users to manually navigate complex software interfaces and understand tool parameters, the system uses machine learning models to interpret user intent and automatically configure editing operations, substituting manual mechanical interaction with intelligent automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If machine learning techniques are used to simplify the interface, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing by pre-training machine learning models on extensive datasets of editing operations and user preferences. These models are prepared in advance to quickly interpret user commands and suggest appropriate editing operations without requiring complex real-time processing. The preliminary training and model preparation work is done offline, allowing the runtime system to operate with simpler, faster inference processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic adaptation where the machine learning models continuously learn from user interactions and editing outcomes, adjusting their behavior to better match user preferences and content characteristics. This dynamic learning capability allows the system to improve ease of operation over time while managing complexity through incremental updates rather than requiring the full complexity to be present from the start.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12548597B2System evolving architectures for refining media content editing systems
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 LEMON INC(GB)
  • US12548597B2 patent drawing
  • US12548597B2 patent drawing
  • US12548597B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples are provided relating to system evolving architectures for refining media content editing systems. One aspect includes a method of refining a media content editing architecture, the method comprising: editing a media content using a large language model and a back-end tool service comprising a prompt pool and a plurality of application programming interfaces corresponding to a plurality of editing tools; publishing the edited media content; storing contextual information relating to the editing of the media content; and refining the media content editing architecture using the stored contextual information.