LLM Microservice Orchestration Across Edge and Cloud Tiers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in efficiently orchestrating microservices across multi-tiered computing infrastructures, particularly in balancing cost and latency for distributed computing applications with dynamic workloads.

Innovation Solution

Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to build cost and latency models, analyze microservice data, and learn trigger rules for optimal microservice placement, thereby dynamically orchestrating microservices across edge and cloud computing tiers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If microservices are placed closer to users to reduce latency, then response time is improved, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic microservice placement by continuously monitoring workload patterns and user distribution, then adjusting microservice locations in real-time. The system transitions from static placement to dynamic relocation based on changing conditions, allowing optimization of the latency-cost tradeoff at any given moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes placement parameters of microservices based on analyzed workload characteristics. By modifying parameters such as location, replication factor, and resource allocation, the system optimizes the balance between response time and operational cost for different workload scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If custom models are rebuilt and re-deployed when changes are needed, then system accuracy is improved, but time and effort increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem accuracyVSAvoidmodel retraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-trains foundation models with comprehensive knowledge of microservice orchestration, cloud infrastructure, and workload patterns before deployment. This preliminary training enables the models to handle new scenarios and workload changes without requiring complete retraining, thus maintaining accuracy while reducing re-deployment time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors performance metrics and workload patterns, using this feedback to fine-tune and update models in an iterative manner. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to changing conditions and improve accuracy over time without requiring substantial retraining from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If complex customizations are implemented across multiple computing tiers, then system functionality is improved, but complexity and deployment effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoiddeployment effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs foundation models that are universally applicable across multiple computing tiers (edge, fog, cloud) and various microservice workloads. These models serve multiple functions including workload analysis, placement optimization, and cost management, reducing the need for tier-specific customizations and simplifying deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The foundation models act as intermediaries between different computing tiers and workload requirements. They translate complex multi-tier orchestration needs into standardized model responses, simplifying the deployment process while maintaining system functionality across heterogeneous environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250291646A1Leveraging large language models to orchestrate microservices
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA INC
  • US20250291646A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291646A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291646A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for leveraging large language models for orchestrating microservices. A cost model and a latency model can be built with a large language model (LLM) based on an instruction prompt that analyzes microservice data of a distributed computing application. The microservice data can be analyzed to learn trigger rules that facilitate placement of microservices at optimal locations within the multi-tiered computing infrastructure based on cost and latency. The microservices can be placed at the optimal locations based on the trigger rules. The LLM can be tuned using feedback from the distributed computing application after placing the microservices at the optimal locations.