AI-Assisted Network Audit System Using LLM Agents

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional network audits are manual, time-consuming, and prone to errors, requiring significant effort for data processing and report customization, which hampers efficiency and compliance in network management.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an AI-assisted network audit system using a Large Language Model (LLM) based Network Copilot for automated data extraction, normalization, and report generation, featuring a user interface for uploading audit criteria, agent-based data collection, and modules for data correlation and normalization to produce unified audit reports.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual network audit methods are used, then flexibility in customizing audit criteria and reports is maintained, but time consumption and error rates increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudit accuracyVSAvoidaudit time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the audit platform automatically collects data from network devices, processes it through normalization and correlation modules, and generates compliance reports without requiring manual intervention for each audit task, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining accuracy through systematic automated procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical audit processes are replaced with an automated electronic system that uses software agents to collect data, algorithmic modules to normalize and correlate data, and automated report generation tools to produce audit results, eliminating human error and significantly reducing audit time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated data collection tools are used, then data collection efficiency improves, but manual processing and normalization effort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing system is segmented into distinct functional modules: data collection agents, normalization module with vendor-specific templates, correlation module, and report generation module. Each module handles a specific aspect of processing, making the complex automated processing manageable and maintainable while preserving high data collection efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Normalization templates act as intermediaries between raw collected data and the correlation module. These templates standardize data from multiple vendors into a common format, automatically bridging the gap between diverse data sources and the analysis requirements without requiring manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual report generation is performed, then report customization for different user personas is flexible, but time consumption and error risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereport customizationVSAvoidreport generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The report generation module is designed with universal templates that can serve multiple user personas (security teams, network architecture teams, compliance officers) with different reporting needs. A single automated system handles diverse report requirements by applying different templates and parameters, maintaining adaptability while eliminating manual generation time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Report templates and formatting rules are pre-configured for different user personas and compliance requirements. When an audit is executed, the system automatically selects and applies the appropriate pre-prepared templates, eliminating the need for manual report customization while maintaining flexibility for different stakeholders

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If traditional manual audit methods are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but productivity and compliance efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidaudit productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated audit system is divided into distinct functional segments (data collection agents, normalization module, correlation module, report generation module) that can be independently configured and maintained. This modular architecture manages complexity while enabling high automated productivity across all audit functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240422084A1System and Method for AI-Assisted Network Audits
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 AVIZ NETWORKS INC
  • US20240422084A1 patent drawing
  • US20240422084A1 patent drawing
  • US20240422084A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one general aspect, the method may include providing a user interface on a web server for users to upload audit criteria, where audit criteria further may include a mode of collection to by utilized by a collector module. Said method may also include installing a plurality of agents for automated data collection, where the agents are software modules controlled by an LLM network module. Said method may furthermore include receiving audit criteria from users in predefined template documents into the LLM network module. Said method may in addition include processing the audit criteria by the LLM network module and triggering automatic data collection by a collector to create collected data.