LLM Personalization Using Supplemental Prompts and User Response Records

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large language models lack personalization and customization, generating the same output for different users regardless of their individual characteristics, such as age, education, or background.

Innovation Solution

A system that refines machine learning models by storing user responses to prompts, analyzing these responses to determine user attributes, and generating supplemental prompts to gather more data, ultimately training the model to customize outputs based on individual user characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a large language model generates content for multiple users, then the model can serve a broad audience, but the output lacks personalization and customization for individual users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the personalization process by separating the collection of user response data from the model training process. User responses to prompts are collected and stored separately, then used to refine the model in a distinct training phase. This allows the model to maintain its general functionality while adding personalized capabilities through incremental refinement based on individual user data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by collecting and storing user response data before using it to refine the model. User interactions with prompts are captured and accumulated in advance, creating a dataset that can be used for subsequent model refinement. This preliminary data collection enables the model to be customized without requiring complete retraining from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the model is refined based on individual user responses, then personalized output is achieved, but the time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization levelVSAvoidmodel refinement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by refining the model only on the subset of data most relevant to personalization - specifically, user responses to prompts. Rather than retraining the entire model on all possible data, the system focuses computational efforts on the specific user interaction data that directly contributes to personalization, achieving customization with reduced time and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of information

If supplemental prompts are provided to gather user data, then more comprehensive user profiles are created, but the user interaction burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser attribute informationVSAvoiduser interface simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universality by designing prompts that serve multiple functions simultaneously. The same prompts used for general model interaction also serve to collect user response data for personalization. This multi-functionality allows the system to gather comprehensive user information without requiring separate, dedicated data collection interactions, thereby maintaining interface simplicity while reducing information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12572855B1Systems and methods for refining machine learning models based on user responses to prompts
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 SHAPIRO DMITRY
  • US12572855B1 patent drawing
  • US12572855B1 patent drawing
  • US12572855B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for refining machine learning models based on user responses to prompts. Exemplary implementations may: store response records for individual users that include responses by individual ones of the users to prompts; provide supplemental prompts to a first user; receive user input from the first user indication responses to the supplemental prompts; obtain the first response record for the first user from storage; for the first user, refine a first machine learning model based on responses by the first user to the supplemental prompts and the first response record, refining includes training the first machine learning model to customize outputs generated by the model for the first user; provide the refined machine learning model for use by the first user; and/or other exemplary implementations.