LLM-Driven SEO Work Request Generation and Contributor Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of improving search engine optimization (SEO) is time-consuming and difficult, requiring coordination between multiple entities, and existing SEO analysis firms do not provide services to add content to a company's website to enhance its rank, leading to inefficiencies in content preparation and tracking.

Innovation Solution

A method for dynamically generating work requests for SEO based on target entity parameters and selected keywords, utilizing large language models (LLMs) to create instructions and outlines for articles, identifying potential contributors, and assigning work requests to draft content to improve search engine rankings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a company manually drafts new content for the website based on SEO analysis firm results, then the company can improve its search engine ranking, but the process becomes time-consuming and difficult to track

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch engine rankingVSAvoidcontent preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the marketing department to automatically generate work requests and track content creation progress without relying on external SEO analysis firms to provide content drafting services. The automated system handles task creation, assignment tracking, and status monitoring, allowing the company to serve its own SEO content needs efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides automated tracking and status updates on content creation tasks, giving the marketing department real-time feedback on which tasks are completed, in progress, or pending. This feedback mechanism eliminates the difficulty of manually tracking who is responsible for which content and ensures timely completion for SEO improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the marketing department coordinates with multiple third parties and freelancers to build content, then more content can be produced, but the coordination becomes complex and time-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent production volumeVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the content creation process into discrete, trackable tasks that can be independently assigned to different freelancers or third parties. Each work request represents a specific content task with clear deliverables, allowing parallel processing of multiple content pieces without complex interdependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system serves multiple functions within a single platform: it generates work requests automatically, assigns tasks to multiple contributors, tracks progress in real-time, and manages content delivery. This universal system replaces the need for separate coordination mechanisms for each aspect of content production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If SEO analysis firms provide only rank information without content drafting services, then the company can maintain specialized SEO tracking, but additional manual work is required to create improvement content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch rank tracking accuracyVSAvoidcontent creation effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically generating detailed work requests with specific content requirements, assignment instructions, and tracking parameters based on SEO analysis data. This preliminary structuring of content creation tasks eliminates the need for manual planning and coordination effort while maintaining precise SEO tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12437022B1Dynamic generation of work requests
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 SKYWORD
  • US12437022B1 patent drawing
  • US12437022B1 patent drawing
  • US12437022B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects described herein generally relate to improving search engine optimization (SEO) by improving a process for selecting keywords for search engine optimization, constructing work requests based on selected keywords and output from a first and second large learning model (LLM), and selecting potential contributors to draft articles based on the work requests and prior drafting experience. More specifically, aspects provide for faster construction of work requests and selection of potential qualified contributors. Aspects further provide for improved ability to track SEO improvements for selected keywords.