LLM Data Processing With Symbolic Verification for Output Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer applications struggle with processing heterogeneous and broad data collections, leading to impractical schema building and limited understanding of natural language, with deep learning models producing unreliable and inaccurate outputs.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing a structured, machine-readable representation of data, such as a universal language, to interact with large language models (LLMs) for improved output generation and validation, including methods to avoid hallucination and add citations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If deep learning models are used to process natural language, then the system can handle broad and heterogeneous data collections, but the output becomes unreliable and inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to process heterogeneous dataVSAvoidoutput accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification system that acts as a mediator between the deep learning model and the final output. This intermediary layer validates predictions against structured knowledge bases and factual databases, correcting inaccuracies while preserving the model's ability to handle diverse data types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where model outputs are continuously validated against ground truth data and structured knowledge sources. Incorrect predictions trigger corrective feedback that adjusts the verification process, improving reliability without sacrificing the model's adaptability to different data formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If a comprehensive schema is built to cover all possible data types, then the application can handle any heterogeneous data, but the schema becomes enormously complex and impractical to build

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata coverage scopeVSAvoidschema complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a universal data representation framework that uses a small set of core schema elements capable of representing multiple data types through polymorphic structures. This universal schema can accommodate heterogeneous data including text, numbers, dates, and structured objects without requiring separate complex definitions for each data type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts schema parameters based on the specific data being processed. Rather than maintaining a static comprehensive schema, the framework selectively activates relevant schema elements and parameters according to the data type and context, reducing complexity while maintaining full data coverage capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If statistical machine learning is used to process natural language, then the system can learn from large datasets, but the results cannot be explained and the system lacks real understanding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning capabilityVSAvoidsemantic understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the processing pipeline into distinct stages: statistical learning for pattern recognition, structured knowledge representation for semantic meaning, and verification for factual accuracy. Each segment handles specific aspects of understanding, preserving semantic information that would otherwise be lost in purely statistical approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Structured knowledge bases and semantic representation systems serve as intermediaries between statistical learning outputs and final interpretations. These intermediaries maintain explicit semantic relationships and factual constraints, preventing the loss of meaningful understanding while allowing statistical methods to drive learning from large datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12456008B2Computer implemented methods for the automated analysis or use of data, including use of a large language model
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 UNLIKELY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LTD
  • US12456008B2 patent drawing
  • US12456008B2 patent drawing
  • US12456008B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a method of improving the operation of a generative AI large language model (LLM)-based data processing system, by operating the LLM-based system in conjunction with a non-LLM data processing system; and in which (a) the LLM-based system sends a continuation as an input to the non-LLM system, and (b) the non-LLM system (i) uses symbolic representations to perform non-statistical reasoning on the input from the LLM-based system and (ii) generates a reasoned prompt or other context.