LLM Tagging for Consistent Data Authorization Policies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data authorization systems in Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) face challenges in deriving scalable and efficient arbitrary policies due to reliance on user-defined tags, subjectivity noise, and limited computational methods, which result in inconsistent access policies and security risks.

Innovation Solution

A data authorization decision point utilizing a large language model (LLM) with pre-trained rich semantics and prompt engineering to automatically generate arbitrary tags and access policies, reducing the need for extensive data and computational resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If user-defined tags are used for data authorization, then the system is easy to operate, but the policy consistency and security reliability deteriorate due to user subjectivity and potential errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of defining access policiesVSAvoidpolicy consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated tagging of data files using an LLM before authorization decisions are made. The LLM analyzes the semantic content of each data file and generates appropriate tags in advance, eliminating the need for manual user tagging and ensuring consistent, accurate tagging that reflects the actual content semantics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an LLM-based intermediary component that mediates between the raw data content and the authorization policy enforcement. This intermediary automatically extracts semantic meaning from data files and generates tags that serve as the basis for policy matching, removing human subjectivity from the tagging process while maintaining policy enforceability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If expert-driven approaches are used to derive access policies, then the policies can be customized, but the scalability and generalization capability deteriorate due to the complexity of deriving general rules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy customizationVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automated policy derivation where the LLM autonomously analyzes data files, generates appropriate tags, and applies policies without requiring expert intervention for each case. The LLM learns from training data and automatically generalizes to new scenarios, maintaining both customization capability and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the complex problem of policy derivation into a parameter-based tagging system. Instead of requiring experts to define complex policies for each scenario, the system uses the LLM to extract semantic parameters (tags) from data content, which then map to predefined policies. This parameter transformation enables scalable policy application across diverse data types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If current data-driven methods are used for tag generation, then computational resources are limited, but the semantic richness and tag diversity deteriorate due to limited training corpus and modeling approaches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidsemantic richness
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical NLP processing methods with an LLM-based semantic understanding system. The LLM leverages pre-trained knowledge and advanced transformer architecture to extract rich semantic meaning from data files, generating diverse and accurate tags without requiring exponentially more computational resources. This substitution enables high semantic richness while maintaining computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12495077B2Efficient arbitrary policies for data authorization decision points
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 DELL PROD LP
  • US12495077B2 patent drawing
  • US12495077B2 patent drawing
  • US12495077B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One example method includes receiving a data file at a large language model (LLM). Arbitrary tags that include labels that are attachable to the data file and prompts are also received. The prompts are paired with the arbitrary tags to form arbitrary tag-prompt pairs and include information that is used by the LLM to find the paired arbitrary tag. The LLM determines a selected subset of the arbitrary tags that apply to the data file. A trust module receives the selected subset of the arbitrary tags that apply to the data file and data access policies that specify access rules for the data file. A conditional access decision is determined that specifies whether access should be given to the data file.