LLM Content Personalization via User Segment Examples

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies struggle to personalize text-based content effectively for different user segments, as adapting textual style does not sufficiently resonate with users' specific interests, leading to inefficient content creation and increased computing resource usage.

Innovation Solution

The technology facilitates the efficient and effective generation of alternative examples for content in an automated manner, using machine learning models to identify source examples and generate tailored alternative examples that correspond to different user segments, thereby personalizing content without the need for continuous content creation and review.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual content creation and review processes are used to personalize content for different user segments, then content relevance to user interests is improved, but productivity decreases and loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent relevanceVSAvoidcontent creation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual content creation process with an automated machine learning system. The ML model generates alternative examples for different user segments automatically, substituting human writers and editors with an algorithmic system that can produce personalized content at scale without manual intervention for each user segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables content to serve itself by automatically generating alternative examples for different user segments without requiring manual review or adjustment. The ML model autonomously analyzes the original content and produces tailored variations for specific user interests, making the content personalization process self-sufficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If manual content generation and validation processes are used to create personalized content, then content quality is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent qualityVSAvoidcontent generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-generating alternative examples for different user segments automatically. The ML model is trained beforehand to understand content patterns and can rapidly generate quality alternative examples when needed, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual creation and validation processes for each content piece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automated machine learning processes are used to generate alternative examples, then productivity is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent generation efficiencyVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by generating alternative examples only for specific user segments when needed, rather than creating all possible variations continuously. The ML model processes and generates content on-demand based on user interest identification, reducing unnecessary computing resource consumption while maintaining high productivity for relevant content personalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250148192A1Generating alternative examples for content
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 ADOBE INC
  • US20250148192A1 patent drawing
  • US20250148192A1 patent drawing
  • US20250148192A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, computer systems, computer-storage media, and graphical user interfaces are provided for efficiently generating alternative examples for content. In embodiments, a source example prompt is obtained at a large language model. The source example prompt includes text associated with a source content and an instruction to generate a source example from the text associated with the source content. Using the large language model, the source example that represents an entity and corresponding context from the text is generated. Thereafter, the source example and a set of user segments are provided as input into the large language model to generate alternative examples associated with the source content. Each alternative example corresponds to a user segment of the set of user segments. Based on a particular user segment associated with a user interested in the source content, an alternative example corresponding to the particular user segment is provided for display.