Language Model Summarization via Semantical Clustering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Language models often omit or misrepresent crucial details in summaries, leading to incomplete or misleading information, and may not evenly cover all concepts, especially when constrained by summary size limitations.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for precise summarization using multi-level semantical clustering, where input text is segregated into concepts, clustered, and summarized in a way that ensures all concept clusters are covered, with mechanisms to adjust similarity thresholds and cluster sizes to match prompt requirements, and additional processing to rephrase and check for missing concepts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If LLMs generate summaries under size constraints, then summary length is controlled, but coverage completeness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary lengthVSAvoidcoverage completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the input document into multiple concept clusters based on semantic similarity. Each cluster represents a coherent topic or theme. By processing summaries at the cluster level rather than treating the entire document as one unit, the system can ensure comprehensive coverage of all concepts while maintaining controlled overall length through selective cluster inclusion and hierarchical organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to summarization by organizing content into multiple levels: concept clusters at the first level, and potentially sub-clusters or detailed summaries at lower levels. This multi-level structure allows the system to provide both concise overviews and detailed coverage of specific concepts, resolving the tension between summary length and coverage completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If LLMs focus on early document sections, then initial concepts are covered, but later important concepts are omitted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcept coverage accuracyVSAvoidconcept distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary segmentation of the entire document into concept clusters before generating summaries. This upfront organization ensures that all concepts throughout the document, including those in later sections, are identified and structured. The summarization process then operates on this complete structure, preventing bias toward early sections and ensuring uniform coverage of all important concepts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If LLMs generate detailed summaries, then comprehensiveness improves, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary comprehensivenessVSAvoidcomputational resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by generating summaries at multiple levels of detail. Not all concept clusters require the same level of elaboration - some can be covered in brief mentions while others receive more detailed treatment. This selective approach maintains comprehensiveness by covering all concepts while reducing overall resource consumption compared to uniformly detailed summaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Productivity

If LLMs produce concise summaries, then generation speed improves, but accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary generation speedVSAvoidsummary accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the document into pre-identified concept clusters, the system can generate summaries more efficiently. The LLM operates on structured cluster representations rather than raw text, which accelerates processing. At the same time, accuracy is maintained because each cluster's semantic boundaries ensure that key concepts are captured faithfully, even in concise form.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250094716A1Language model summarization using semantical clustering
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US20250094716A1 patent drawing
  • US20250094716A1 patent drawing
  • US20250094716A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for language model (LM) summarization using semantical clustering are provided. In one technique, a plurality of concepts reflected in text data is identified. A plurality of concept clusters is generated based on similarity among the plurality of concepts. Thus, some concept clusters may include multiple concepts. For each concept cluster of the plurality of concept clusters, an LM generates a summary of the text corresponding to that concept cluster. A summary response of the text data is generated by aggregating the summary of each concept cluster of the plurality of concept clusters. In another technique, an LM generates a summary based on text data. A first set of concepts reflected in the summary is identified and a second set of concepts reflected in the text data is identified. A difference between the two sets may indicate that the summary is missing one or more concepts.