LMFP Precursor Synthesis for Uniform Particle Morphology

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for preparing lithium manganese iron phosphate positive electrode active materials face challenges such as irregular morphology, large particle size, wide particle size distribution, uneven element distribution, and poor batch stability and consistency, which affect the electrochemical performance of secondary batteries.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a low-heating-temperature solid-state reaction to prepare an ammonium manganese iron phosphate precursor, which is then converted into a lithium manganese iron phosphate positive electrode active material through a solid-state sintering process, resulting in regular morphology, small particle size, and uniform element distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If liquid-phase co-precipitation is used to prepare precursors, then the preparation process is simple, but the precursor has irregular morphology, large particle size, wide particle size distribution, and poor batch stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreparation process simplicityVSAvoidparticle size control and morphology uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the preparation parameters by using solid-state reaction at low heating temperature (900-1100°C) instead of liquid-phase co-precipitation, and controls the sintering time (10-30 minutes) to achieve regular morphology and narrow particle size distribution while maintaining preparation simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary mixing of raw materials (Li2CO3, MnO2, Fe2O3, and doping oxides) before sintering to ensure uniform element distribution, which preliminary prepares the precursor with controlled morphology and size distribution before the final sintering process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If conventional solid-state sintering is used, then high temperature treatment is applied, but energy consumption is high and particle size is large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial crystallinity and phase purityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the sintering parameters by using low heating temperature (900-1100°C) and short sintering time (10-30 minutes), which reduces energy consumption while still achieving complete reaction and good crystallinity of the lithium manganese iron phosphate material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary mixing and uniform distribution of raw materials before sintering, which ensures complete reaction at lower temperature and shorter time, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining material quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If precursor preparation is optimized for small particle size, then particle size is reduced, but element distribution becomes uneven

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle sizeVSAvoidelement distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs thorough preliminary mixing of all raw materials (Li2CO3, MnO2, Fe2O3, and doping oxides) with appropriate particle size before sintering, which ensures uniform element distribution is achieved before the sintering process, preventing segregation even when final particle size is small

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies doping elements (NiO, Co3O4, MgO, ZnO, CaO, TiO2, V2O5, or Cr2O3) at specific local sites in the crystal structure to improve both particle size control and element distribution uniformity simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If production scale is increased, then productivity improves, but batch stability and consistency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction scaleVSAvoidbatch stability and consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary mixing and uniform distribution of all raw materials before sintering, which ensures that even when production scale is increased, the element distribution remains consistent across batches, maintaining batch stability and consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses fixed and optimized sintering parameters (temperature: 900-1100°C, time: 10-30 minutes) that can be consistently reproduced at different production scales, ensuring batch stability while improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method simplifies the preparation process, reduces costs, increases yield, and enhances batch stability and consistency, leading to improved electrochemical performance of the lithium manganese iron phosphate positive electrode active material and secondary batteries.

Implementation Method 1

mixing and grinding metal source powder and phosphorus source powder to enable a low-heating-temperature solid-state reaction of each component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolid-state reaction:

Implementation Method 2

converted into a lithium manganese iron phosphate positive electrode active material through a solid-state sintering process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS20250083961A1Ammonium manganese iron phosphate precursor, lithium manganese iron phosphate positive electrode active material, preparation method thereof, and secondary battery
Publication Date: 2025.03.13 CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) LIMITED
  • US20250083961A1 patent drawing
  • US20250083961A1 patent drawing
  • US20250083961A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for preparing the ammonium manganese iron phosphate precursor includes mixing and grinding metal source powder and phosphorus source powder to enable a low-heating-temperature solid-state reaction of each component, and then washing and drying the obtained product to obtain the ammonium manganese iron phosphate precursor, where the metal source includes an iron source, a manganese source and an optional source of a doping element M which represents doping elements at manganese and iron sites, and the phosphorus source includes triammonium phosphate.