Dynamic LNA Disconnection for Filterless MIMO Interference Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, the removal of surface acoustic wave (SAW) filters from MIMO receive chains to reduce cost and complexity leads to increased internal interference, potentially damaging components like the low noise amplifier (LNA) and degrading performance, especially in FDD and TDD systems where concurrent transmission and reception occur.

Innovation Solution

A method where the LNA is selectively connected or disconnected from the receive chain based on the internal interference level, determined by the transmit power, to protect the LNA and adjust operations to account for the absence of a SAW filter, including modifying baseband processor operations and channel state information reporting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If SAW filters are removed from MIMO receive chains, then cost and complexity are reduced, but internal interference increases and component reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter complexityVSAvoidcomponent reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic switching between filtered and unfiltered receive paths based on interference conditions. The system monitors interference levels and selectively activates the SAW filter for specific receive chains only when needed, transitioning from a static always-on filter architecture to a dynamic conditional architecture that reduces overall complexity while maintaining reliability when required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies filtering selectively to specific receive chains rather than uniformly across all MIMO receive paths. By identifying which receive chains experience harmful interference and applying SAW filters only to those specific chains, the system achieves local optimization that reduces overall device complexity and cost while maintaining component reliability only where necessary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If SAW filters are removed from MIMO receive chains, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but internal interference increases and may damage components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidinternal interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the SAW filter from the standard MIMO receive chain architecture and places it in a conditional, selective position. Instead of having filters permanently integrated into all receive paths, the system extracts the filtering function and applies it only to specific receive chains when interference conditions warrant it, reducing manufacturing cost while protecting against harmful interference through selective deployment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an interference monitoring and control mechanism that acts as an intermediary between the transmit and receive chains. This intermediary monitors interference levels and selectively activates filtering only when harmful interference is detected, mediating between the cost-saving unfiltered architecture and the protection-needed filtered architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If LNA is continuously connected to protect against interference, then component protection is improved, but performance degrades due to increased insertion loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent protectionVSAvoidinsertion loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic monitoring of interference levels and selective activation of protective measures. Instead of continuously connecting protective elements that would cause constant insertion loss, the system periodically checks for harmful interference and only activates protection (such as disconnecting the LNA or activating filters) when interference is detected, achieving component protection while minimizing energy loss during normal operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Device complexity

If internal interference is allowed to increase without filtering, then device complexity is reduced, but system productivity decreases due to performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceive chain complexityVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the receive chain dynamically based on interference conditions. Instead of maintaining a fixed complex filtered architecture, the system adjusts parameters such as filter activation status, receive chain connectivity, and processing modes based on real-time interference measurements, achieving simplified operation during good conditions while maintaining performance during poor conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11202264B2Filterless multiple input multiple output (MIMO) reception
Publication Date: 2021.12.14 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11202264B2 patent drawing
  • US11202264B2 patent drawing
  • US11202264B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some techniques and apparatuses described herein protect components of a user equipment (UE), such as a low noise amplifier (LNA), from internal interference. For example, the LNA may be disconnected from a receive chain during periods of high internal interference, and may be reconnected to the receive chain during periods of low internal interference. Furthermore, some techniques and apparatuses described herein improve performance by adjusting operations of the UE to account for and/or offset increased internal interference due to a receive chain that does not include a surface acoustic wave (SAW) filter to remove unwanted radio frequency signals. For example, one or more operations of a baseband processor may be modified to account for the increased internal interference. Additionally, or alternatively, reporting of channel state information may be modified to account for increased internal interference of the UE. Additional details are described herein.