Load-Balancing Rappel Device With Serpentine Rope Friction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current rappel devices used by soldiers for descending from helicopters are inefficient for controlling descent rates, especially when carrying loads, as they require manual engagement and disengagement, apply uneven friction, and are not suitable for multiple users or heavy equipment.

Innovation Solution

A load balancing descending device with a serpentine rope configuration and pivotally connected plates that automatically adjust friction based on the user's and load's weight, allowing controlled descent by rotating as the rope free end shortens, enabling one-handed operation and easy engagement/disengagement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If standard rappel devices are used for descending, then the descent can be controlled, but the engagement and disengagement process takes too long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement and disengagement timeVSAvoidoperation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The rappelling system is segmented into modular components: a quick-connect carabiner attachment mechanism that separates the user from the rope, a friction control device with adjustable components, and a guide ring system. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and enables rapid engagement/disengagement by simply connecting or disconnecting the carabiner without manipulating the entire rappel device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Weight of moving object

If thin ropes are used for descending, then the descent equipment can be lightweight, but the ropes get sucked into the helicopter's rotors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverope weightVSAvoidrotor suction effect
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The guide ring system acts as a counterweight mechanism that offsets the suction force from helicopter rotors. The large-diameter guide ring (6-12 inches) creates a mechanical advantage that prevents the rope from being pulled into the rotors, allowing the use of lighter ropes that would otherwise be vulnerable to rotor suction forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Speed

If friction-based rappel devices are used, then the descent rate can be controlled, but the friction applied is uneven and becomes insufficient as the user approaches the ground

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedescent rate controlVSAvoidfriction consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The friction control device incorporates dynamic adjustment capabilities with movable components that can be adjusted during descent. The system includes an adjustable friction plate or cam mechanism that allows the user to modify the friction coefficient in real-time, maintaining consistent descent rate control regardless of changing load conditions or rope tension as the user approaches the ground.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Force

If thick braided ropes are used for fast-roping, then the ropes provide sufficient friction, but they are not suitable when the soldier has additional heavy loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction forceVSAvoidload capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the critical parameter from rope friction to device-controlled friction. By using a friction control device with adjustable mechanical advantage and a guide ring system, the rope itself can be lighter and thinner while the device provides the necessary friction force. This allows the system to adapt to various load weights by adjusting the friction device settings rather than changing the rope.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Ease of operation

If manual rappel devices are used, then the descent can be controlled, but they require two hands for operation and cannot be easily engaged or disengaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehands-free operation capabilityVSAvoidattachment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment mechanism extracts the complex manual operation requirements from the rappelling system by using a separate quick-connect carabiner system. The carabiner handles the attachment/detachment function independently, allowing the main rappel device to focus solely on friction control. This separation enables one-handed operation where the user can attach/detach with one hand while maintaining control with the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device ensures a controlled and safe descent by automatically balancing the user's and load's weight against the rope's weight, maintaining a consistent rate and allowing for rapid, controlled landings even with heavy equipment.

Implementation Method 1

the rope is wrapped in a serpentine manner about the first pin and the second pin between the first plate and the second plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

As the user descends the rope, the length and weight of the rope free end decreases thereby causing the load balancing descending device to rotate moving the rope free end in a general direction from the first side toward the second side and automatically balancing the weight of the user and load against the weight of the rope free end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS9016431B2Load balancing descending device
Publication Date: 2015.04.28 GREAT TRANGO HLDG
  • US9016431B2 patent drawing
  • US9016431B2 patent drawing
  • US9016431B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A load balancing descending device for controlling the descent of a user descending on a rope carrying a load is provided. The rope has a decreasing rope free end as the user descends. The load balancing descending device comprises a first plate and a second plate. A first pin is positioned between the first plate and the second plate with the first pin spacing the first plate from and pivotally connecting the first plate to the second plate and the combined first plate and second plate having a first side and a second side. A second pin is positioned between the first plate and the second plate with the second pin spaced from the first pin. An attachment mechanism is formed in the first side of the combined first plate and second plate for attaching a user and/or load. The rope is wrapped in a serpentine manner about the first pin and the second pin between the first plate and the second plate with the rope free end exiting the combined first plate and second plate from the second side. As the user descends the rope, the length and weight of the rope free end decreases thereby causing the load balancing descending device to rotate moving the rope free end in a general direction from the first side toward the second side and automatically balancing the weight of the user and load against the weight of the rope free end in order to maintain a controlled rate of descent.