Load-Balancing Server for Healthcare Classification Code Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The healthcare industry faces challenges when transitioning from one set of classification codes, such as ICD-9 to ICD-10, leading to incorrect and incomplete coding of medical services, which can result in billing and insurance compliance issues.

Innovation Solution

A load-balancing server system that includes modules for real-time inputting, reviewing, auditing, and reporting of classification codes, utilizing a load-balancing technique to distribute processing resources efficiently and ensure accuracy and compliance, and includes modules for receiving, reviewing, and transmitting classification codes, notifications, and compliance reviews between user devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple data transformation modules are deployed to handle classification code conversion, then processing capacity and compliance accuracy improve, but system complexity and resource management difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the classification code conversion workload into multiple independent data transformation modules, each capable of handling specific conversion tasks. This segmentation allows parallel processing of different code sets (ICD-9 to ICD-10, CPT to HCPCS) while maintaining manageable individual module complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A load-balancing server is introduced as an intermediary component that receives incoming classification code conversion requests, determines the appropriate data transformation module to handle each request, and routes them accordingly. This mediator simplifies the overall system architecture by centralizing the decision-making logic and shielding users from the underlying complexity of multiple modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If computing resources are dynamically allocated to data transformation modules based on load, then processing efficiency improves, but resource management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidresource management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The load-balancing server implements dynamic resource allocation by continuously monitoring the load status of each data transformation module and adjusting the distribution of conversion requests in real-time. Modules with lower current loads receive more requests, while overloaded modules are temporarily reduced in capacity, optimizing overall processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where data transformation modules report their current processing status and load levels back to the load-balancing server. This feedback loop enables the server to make informed decisions about request routing and resource allocation, automatically adapting to changing system conditions without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If real-time review and auditing modules are added to ensure coding accuracy, then compliance reliability improves, but system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary review and auditing actions during the classification code conversion process itself, rather than as separate post-processing steps. The load-balancing server coordinates review modules to examine codes during transformation, identifying potential compliance issues early in the workflow before final submission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The review and auditing functions are merged into the existing data transformation modules and load-balancing infrastructure. Rather than adding completely separate systems, the compliance checking capabilities are integrated into the modules that already handle code conversion, sharing computational resources and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive error notification and clarification modules are implemented, then coding accuracy improves, but communication overhead and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements selective error notification that skips routine or minor issues that do not require user attention. Only significant errors or ambiguities that could affect compliance are flagged for user clarification, allowing the majority of conversions to proceed through the system without interruption or additional communication overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS10051047B2Load-balancing server for data transformation modules
Publication Date: 2018.08.14 ATOS FRANCE
  • US10051047B2 patent drawing
  • US10051047B2 patent drawing
  • US10051047B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments disclosed herein may be directed to a load-balancing server. In some embodiments, the load-balancing server comprises: at least one memory comprising instructions; at least one processing device configured for executing the instructions; and a load-balancing module, coupled to the at least one memory, the at least one processing device, and at least one data transformation module, and configured for: determining a first amount of computing resources for allocating to the at least one data transformation module using a load-balancing technique, wherein the at least one data transformation module is coupled to the at least one memory, the at least one processing device, and the load-balancing module.